The Director of Public Prosecutions v Liam Óg Ó Hannaidh
Proceedings for summary offences under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 are instituted when a written charge is issued; if Attorney General's permission is not obtained before issuance, the proceedings are a nullity and cannot proceed, and section 25(2) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 does not save such...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS; Respondent: LIAM ÓG Ó hANNAIDH; Intervenor: HIS MAJESTY’S ATTORNEY GENERAL
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal by Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Terrorism Offences, Prosecution Consent, Statutory Interpretation, Summary Offences, Time Limits
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
Appellant
LIAM ÓG Ó hANNAIDH
Respondent
HIS MAJESTY’S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal by Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings for a summary offence under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 were validly instituted without Attorney General's permission
- 2 Whether the written charge procedure under section 29 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 constitutes institution of proceedings for the purposes of section 117 of TACT
- 3 Whether section 25(2) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 saves proceedings instituted without proper consent
Ratio Decidendi
Proceedings for summary offences under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 are instituted when a written charge is issued; if Attorney General's permission is not obtained before issuance, the proceedings are a nullity and cannot proceed, and section 25(2) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 does not save such proceedings.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The judge's decision that the court had no jurisdiction to try the charge is upheld.
- The respondent will not be tried for the alleged conduct on 21 November 2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment