The court found that the applicant had established a case for amendment of pleadings to include the intended 3rd respondent, as she acquired an interest in the suit property during the pendency of the suit and was a necessary party. The court held that the application was not fatally defective for being omnibus, as no prejudice was demonstrated by the respondents. The applicant's averments regarding adverse possession and the lack of innocence on the part of the 3rd respondent were uncontroverted. Accordingly, the court granted leave to amend the pleadings and issued an injunction restraining the 3rd respondent from evicting the applicants from the suit property pending determination of the suit. The prayer for an order compelling the Provincial Criminal Investigation Officer to produce a report was declined for lack of justification.