Ali Daud Mohamed v Anthony Maiklya Mwanza, Joseph Kioko Mwanza, Commissioner of Lands, Chief Land Registrar & Yasin Mohamed Jamal [2014] KEHC 8102 (KLR) | Stay Of Execution | Esheria

Ali Daud Mohamed v Anthony Maiklya Mwanza, Joseph Kioko Mwanza, Commissioner of Lands, Chief Land Registrar & Yasin Mohamed Jamal [2014] KEHC 8102 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CIVIL DIVISION

ELC CASE NO. 152 OF 2004

ALI DAUD MOHAMED………………………..…..................PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

ANTHONY MAIKLYA MWANZA &

JOSEPH KIOKO MWANZA

(Sued jointly as administrators of the estate of PHILOMENA MUENI MWANZA)

COMMISSIONER OF LANDS

CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR …………… ..……….…DEFENDANTS

AND

YASIN MOHAMED JAMAL ………..………………INTERESTED PARTY

R U L I N G

1.     By a considered ruling dated 14th and delivered on 15th November 2013 the court (Waweru, J) dismissed an application by notice of motion dated 27th July 2011 filed by the Interested Party herein by which he sought an order to review and set aside the consent judgment entered herein on 17th September 2009.  The court also lifted the interim injunction that had been granted on 20th March 2013.

2.     The Interested Party has now filednotice of motion dated 16th December 2013.  The application seeks the main order of stay of execution of the aforesaid order of dismissal of the Interested Party’s application to review and set aside the consent judgment.  The order of stay is sought pending hearing and determination of an appeal against the said order of dismissal.   The application has been opposed by the Plaintiff.

3. It is my considered view that this present application by the Interested Party is profoundly misconceived.  By its aforesaid ruling delivered on 15th November 2013 this court simply dismissed with costs the Interested Party’s application to review and set aside the consent judgment.  Apart from the order for costs, there is no other positive order in the said ruling capable of execution that might be stayed, and it is apparent that it is not the order of costs that the Interested Party is concerned with in his application.   In any event, the court would hardly grant stay of execution of an order for costs.

4.     The notice of motion dated 16th December 2013 is not only misconceived but lacks merit.  It is hereby dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff.  It is so ordered.

DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 17th DAY OF JULY 2014

H.P.G. WAWERU

JUDGE

DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 18TH DAY OF JULY 2014