Alpha International Investment Limited v Akida (Miscellaneous Application No.88 of 2004) [2005] UGHC 7 (29 June 2005)

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f40\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f41\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f43\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f44\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f45\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f46\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f47\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f48\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid14044078 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid14044078 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid2831162\rsid2911535\rsid3158334\rsid4937002\rsid5589990\rsid7163913\rsid7418884\rsid7946049\rsid8090922\rsid8206372\rsid8347179\rsid8593324\rsid9838215\rsid9917071\rsid12472168\rsid12996972 \rsid14044078\rsid14508062\rsid15101442\rsid15542051}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title Judgment}{\author Acer Customer}{\operator owner}{\creatim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr13\min48}{\revtim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr13\min48}{\version2}{\edmins1} {\nofpages3}{\nofwords633}{\nofchars3611}{\*\company Acer Customer}{\nofcharsws4236}{\vern24689}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984 \dghshow0\dgvshow0\jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\nojkernpunct\rsidroot9917071 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2911535 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2911535 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2911535 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2911535 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2831162 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid15101442 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid15542051 1}}}{\cs16\insrsid15101442 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid14044078 {\insrsid15101442 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\fs24\insrsid12996972\charrsid8347179 \par }{\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 \par IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \par }{\b\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 \par }{\b\fs24\insrsid8206372 MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO}{\b\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 88 OF 2004 \par \par Arising from Civil S}{\b\fs24\insrsid8206372 uit No.}{\b\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 110 OF 2004 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 {\b\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 \par \par }{\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 ALPHA }{\fs24\insrsid8347179\charrsid8347179 INTERNATIONAL]}{\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 \par INVESTMENTS }{\fs24\insrsid8347179\charrsid8347179 LIMITED}{\b\fs24\insrsid8347179\charrsid8347179 ]}{\b\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 \tab }{\b\fs24\insrsid8347179 \'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85..}{\b\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 }{ \fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 {\b\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 VERSUS \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 {\fs24\lang1040\langfe1033\langnp1040\insrsid9838215\charrsid15542051 ALLI GABE AKIDA\tab }{ \fs24\lang1040\langfe1033\langnp1040\insrsid8347179\charrsid15542051 \'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85}{\fs24\lang1040\langfe1033\langnp1040\insrsid9838215\charrsid15542051 : DEFENDANT/APPLICANT \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8206372 {\b\fs24\insrsid15542051 \par }{\b\fs24\insrsid8206372\charrsid8206372 29}{\b\fs24\super\insrsid8206372\charrsid8206372 th}{\b\fs24\insrsid8206372\charrsid8206372 June,}{\b\fs24\insrsid15542051 }{\b\fs24\insrsid8206372\charrsid8206372 2005. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 {\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 \par }{\b\fs24\insrsid9838215\charrsid8347179 BEFORE: THE HON. MR. JUSTICE R. O. OKUMU WENGI \par \par \par }{\b\fs24\insrsid9917071\charrsid8347179 J}{\b\fs24\insrsid14044078\charrsid8347179 UDGMENT:}{\b\fs24\insrsid9917071\charrsid8347179 \par }{\fs24\insrsid9917071\charrsid8347179 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 {\fs24\insrsid9917071\charrsid8347179 This appeal arises out of a civil suit brought against an advocate by a Judgment Creditor in an earlier case before the Chief Magistrates Court. The facts are that in execution of a judgment in Civil Suit No.655 of 2001 the judgment debtor one Taban Issa had been put in civil passion to recover the decretal sum of sum of Shs.573,000/=. The advocate who is the present who is the present appellant issued a pers onal cheque to his counterpart M/s Basaza Wasswa & Co Advocates on the basis of which his client was released from civil prison. In subsequent days the advocates cheque}{\fs24\insrsid7418884\charrsid8347179 was dishonored and he paid cash of Shs.325}{ \fs24\insrsid15101442\charrsid8347179 ,}{\fs24\insrsid7418884\charrsid8347179 000/= leaving a balance of Shs.248,000/=. T he case from which this appeal arises was then filed to recover this sum of Shs.248,000/= from the advocate. In essence therefore the suit was brought to the cheque. \par \par In arguing this appeal Mr}{\fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 .}{\fs24\insrsid7418884\charrsid8347179 Nyote learned counsel for the appellant contended that the su it was incompetent as the plaintiff was not a drawee of the cheque which had been written in the names of M/s Basaza Waswa & Co Advocates, who is the advocates for the Respondent/Plaintiff.}{\fs24\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 Mr}{ \fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 .}{\fs24\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 Nyote argued that the Plaintiff could not sue on the cheque and as such there was no cause of action. Mr}{\fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 .}{ \fs24\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 Basaza Wasswa asked this court to dismiss the appeal.}{\fs24\insrsid9917071\charrsid8347179 \par }{\fs24\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 \par I have examined the court record and the conclusions reached there along the suit to contrive to be heard on its merits. It is clear that the plaintiff of Respondent was not a holder of the cheque in issue and could therefore not sue upon it and has no cause of action against the defendant: }{\b\fs24\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 Auto Garage vs Moroke}{\fs24\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 (1971) EA 514. The Plaintiff was also not a holder of the cheque within the meaning of that word in the Bills of Exchange Act. See }{\b\fs24\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 Arab Bank Ltd vs Ross}{\fs24\ul\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 }{ \fs24\insrsid8593324\charrsid8347179 (1951) 2 QB 216. As such it could not sue on the cheque alter. Further still I did not see any notice of dishonour and none was pleaded in the Plaint without the notice and pleading the Plaintiff could not sustain a suit on this bill: }{\b\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 Emile Habib Bateekha vs Rosen}{\fs24\ul\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 }{\b\fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 Alam Eddin}{\fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 (}{ \fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 1970 (1) ALR 205 at 206. See also }{\b\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 Dhaneshw}{\b\fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 er}{\b\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 }{\b\fs24\ul\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 Vaj}{ \b\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 eshanker Metha vs Doka Fatuhnal}{\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 (1951) 18 EACA 126. This being the case, once no notice of dishonour was given and pleaded }{\fs24\insrsid3158334\charrsid8347179 \par \par }{\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 the defendant would be discharged not only on the cheque but also on any }{\fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 antecedent}{\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 obligation. }{\b\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 Raichur vs Uganda Chemist}{\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 Civil Appeal No.61 of 1956 unreported.}{\fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 }{\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 From the above it is clear that the }{ \fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 plaintiff\rquote s}{\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 suit discloses no cause of action and must be rejected. \par \par But even looking at the case as a whole, one gets the impression that an advocate is being sued in order to realize a decree. By issuing his check and attempting to ensure its discharge his is being held down on the cheque. The new suit is in essence a suit for recovery of the decretal sum already under execution. Besides what I have stated above this kind of case is brought in abuse of the court process is frivolous and vexatious to say the least. It is multiplying }{ \fs24\insrsid12472168\charrsid8347179 proceedings to engulf the advocate of the elusive judgment debtor. It is not in good taste f}{\fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 irs}{\fs24\insrsid12472168\charrsid8347179 tly because a decree is not supposed to be the subject of a new suit to recover it. Further still if the recovery is directed at an advocate who did not get value for a cheque he issued he would not be liable either on the cheque or in contract as there was no consideration for it. For this matter it would be inconceivable if the Plaintiff would have turned against its own lawyers and sued for the balance on the decretal sum; and the L awyers in turn would apply to join the present appellant. Such suit would equally be abusive of the court process. In the result this appeal is allowed, the order of the }{\fs24\insrsid3158334\charrsid8347179 \par \par \par \par \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 {\fs24\insrsid12472168\charrsid8347179 Magistrate is set aside and the Plaintiffs suit is dismissed as the }{ \fs24\insrsid7946049\charrsid8347179 \par }{\fs24\insrsid7163913\charrsid8347179 Notice}{\fs24\insrsid12472168\charrsid8347179 of dishonour of the cheque could not and was not pleaded. The Respondent will pay the costs of this appeal.}{\fs24\insrsid5589990\charrsid8347179 \par }{\fs24\insrsid3158334\charrsid8347179 \par \par \par R. O. Okumu Wengi \par }{\b\fs24\insrsid3158334\charrsid8347179 JUDGE \par }{\fs24\insrsid3158334\charrsid8347179 29/6/2005. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 {\fs24\insrsid9917071\charrsid8347179 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8347179 {\fs24\insrsid9917071\charrsid8347179 \par \par }}