Analo v Republic [2023] KEHC 25899 (KLR)

Analo v Republic (Criminal Revision 006 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 25899 (KLR) (27 November 2023) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 25899 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Kibera

Criminal Revision 006 of 2023

DR Kavedza, J

November 27, 2023

Between

Willis Stanley Analo

Applicant

and

Republic

Respondent

Ruling

1. The applicant was charged and convicted for the offence of breaking into a building and committing a felony contrary to section 306(a) of the Penal Code in Kibera CM Criminal Case No. E1672 of 2022. He was subsequently sentenced to a fine of Kshs. 100,000 in default to serve three (3) years imprisonment.

2. The applicant has now filed a Notice of Motion application dated 16th October 2023, seeking a revision of his sentence. He avers that he has reformed from his past mistakes and prays for a non-custodial sentence for the remaining part of his sentence.

3. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant, Willis Stanley Analo, in which he reiterates the same grounds.

4. The application invokes the revisionary jurisdiction of this court which is donated by section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code which reads as follows:“…The High Court may call for and examine the record of any criminal proceedings before any subordinate court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of any such subordinate court."

5. It is trite law that an appellate court will not interfere with the discretion exercised by the trial court when passing sentence unless it is evident that the trial court took into account an irrelevant factor or that a wrong principle was applied or it overlooked some material factors.

6. Section 307 of the Penal Code provides:“Breaking into building with intent to commit felonyAny person who breaks and enters a schoolhouse, shop, warehouse, store, office, counting-house, garage, pavilion, club, factory or workshop, or any building belonging to a public body, or any building or part of a building licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquor, or a building which is adjacent to a dwelling-house and occupied with it but is not part of it, or any building used as a place of worship, with intent to commit a felony therein, is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for five years..”

7. The applicant herein was sentenced to a fine of Kshs. 100,000/= and in default to serve 3 years imprisonment. The limits of default sentences are set out in section 28(2) of the Penal Code as follows –“In the absence of express provisions in any written law relating thereto, the term of imprisonment or detention under the Detention Camps Act ordered by a court in respect of the non-payment of any sum adjudged to be paid for costs under section 32 or compensation under section 31 or in respect of the non-payment of a fine or of any sum adjudged to be paid under the provisions of any written law shall be such term as in the opinion of the court will satisfy the justice of the case, but shall not exceed in any such case the maximum fixed by the following scale –Amount Maximum periodExceeding Sh. 50,000 ….. …. …. …. …. … 12 months

8. In the present case therefore, the maximum term of imprisonment that the trial court could have imposed upon the Appellant in default of payment of the fine was 12 months. The term of three (3) years imprisonment it imposed was thus unlawful.

9. For that reason, I hereby set aside the sentence of a fine of Kshs. 100,000/= in default to serve three (3) years imprisonment, and substitute it with a sentence of three (3) years from the date of conviction being 7/9/2023.

10. It is so ordered.

RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023. D.KAVEDZAJUDGEIn the presence of:Mr. Mutuma for the State.Applicant present (VTC).Joy/ Naomi C/A.