The court found that the appellant, as the registered proprietor of the suit property, was entitled to possession and protection from trespass. The respondents' right to occupy the land derived solely from the permission granted to Grace, which ceased when Grace vacated the property in 2018. From that point, the respondents became trespassers. The trial magistrate erred in holding the suit was time-barred, as the trespass was continuing and a fresh cause of action arose each day the respondents remained on the land. The trial court further erred in revoking the appellant's title without proper pleading or proof of fraud, contrary to the requirements of the Land Registration Act and established case law. The appellant's title was not shown to have been acquired fraudulently or illegally, and the respondents failed to particularize or prove any such claim. The trial court also improperly granted relief not sought by the parties. The appeal was allowed, the lower court's judgment set aside, and the appellant declared the rightful owner, with orders for eviction, injunction, general damages, and costs.