Autofine Limited & 2 others v Equity Bank (Kenya) Limited [2024] KEHC 15489 (KLR) | Admissibility Of Evidence | Esheria

Autofine Limited & 2 others v Equity Bank (Kenya) Limited [2024] KEHC 15489 (KLR)

Full Case Text

Autofine Limited & 2 others v Equity Bank (Kenya) Limited (Commercial Case E092 of 2020) [2024] KEHC 15489 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (26 November 2024) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15489 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)

Commercial and Tax

Commercial Case E092 of 2020

MN Mwangi, J

November 26, 2024

Between

Autofine Limited

1st Plaintiff

Peninah Njeri Nduati

2nd Plaintiff

Julia Mwihaki Kinandu

3rd Plaintiff

and

Equity Bank (Kenya) Limited

Defendant

Ruling

1. I have considered the oral application made by the plaintiff to have a Report prepared by PW2 produced in evidence, by the said witness being allowed to file his Report which was inadvertently omitted when the plaintiff’s Trial bundle was being filed.

2. The plaintiff’s Advocate has explained that the Report to be filed for production by PW2 will only address the discrepancy in the amount paid by the plaintiffs for the three (3) facilities, and what was supposed to have been paid under the facility letter.

3. From the evidence adduced by PW1, I did not hear him addressing the said issue in regard to the total amount that was paid to the defendant from the facility letter, for the three (3) facilities, and the actual amount paid by the plaintiff. There will therefore be no gap or shortcoming from the evidence that PW1 adduced that PW2 will be coming in to fill or rectify. In my understanding, PW2 will adduce evidence on a professional basis from calculations made by him.

4. Secondly, the witness had already been lined up to testify by the plaintiff from the beginning. He is not a witness that the plaintiff now wishes to bring on board at this stage.

5. I therefore do not agree with Mr. Oketch for the defendant that the Report that PW2 intends to produce is meant to fill in gaps in the plaintiff’s evidence.

6. Thirdly the plaintiff has not closed its case.

7. Fourthly, the defendant’s Counsel will have an opportunity to cross-examine the witness (PW2).

8. I hereby give the plaintiff 14 days to file and serve the Report prepared by PW2.

9. Leave is granted to the defendant to file any additional evidence in response to the Report to be filed by the plaintiff. The leave granted will be for 21 days.

10. This case will be mentioned on 27/1/2025 to take a further hearing date.

It is so ordered.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024, RULING DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT.NJOKI MWANGIJUDGEIn the presence of:Mr. Christopher Rosano for the plaintiffMr. Oketch for the defendantMs B. Wokabi – Court Assistant.