The court determined that, despite the respondent not opposing the review of bond terms, the application raised issues beyond mere admission to bond, including consolidation of cases and admissibility of evidence. Given the complexity and the fact that the lower court had previously denied bond after considering the prosecution's opposition, the High Court found it prudent not to grant the requested orders at this interlocutory stage. Instead, the court held that all parties should be allowed to fully argue the application before a comprehensive ruling is delivered. This approach ensures procedural fairness and prevents prejudice to any party, particularly where the lower court's decision was reasoned and the prosecution's position had shifted between forums.