BEATON SHOWA v THE PEOPLE (SCZ Judgment No. 22 of 1980) [1980] ZMSC 38 (7 October 1980)

BEATON SHOWA v THE PEOPLE (1981) ZR 285 (SC) SUPREME COURT GARDNER AG CJ, BRUCE - LYLE , AG DCJ AND MUWO AG JS 7TH OCTOBER 1980 15 (SCZ Judgment No. 22 of 1980) Flynote Criminal law and procedure - Appeal - Absence of appellant at hearing of appeal - Procedure to be followed - Criminal Procedure Code, Cap.160, s. 325 Headnote The appellant was absent at the time his appeal was ready to be 20 heard. The learned Commissioner dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Held: (i) Section 325 of the Criminal Procedure Code specifically provides that an appeal may be dealt with summarily in the absence 25 of an appellant but there is no provision for appeals to the High Court to be dismissed for want of prosecution. (ii) There was no complete investigation made as to whether the appellant had been duly served with notice that his appeal was due to be heard. 30 Legislation referred to: Criminal Procedure Code, Cap. 160, s. 325. Applicant in person. N Sivakumaran, State Advocate, for the respondent. Judgment Gardner Ag CJ: delivered the judgment of the court. 35 The applicant was convicted of theft by public servant, the particulars being that, whilst employed by the Ministry of Health, he stole drugs from a hospital. He appealed against his conviction and sentence to the High Court in Lusaka. By the time his appeal was ready to be heard he had already served his sentence, and he did not appear before the 40 learned High Court Commissioner who was prepared to hear his appeal. For this reason the learned Commissioner dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. 1981 ZR p286 GARDNER AgCJ Section 325 of the Criminal Procedure Code specifically provides that an appeal may be dealt with summarily in the absence of an appellant. There are two criticisms which we would make of the procedure adopted in this case. The first is that no complete investigation was made 5 as to whether the appellant had been duly served with notice that his appeal was due to be heard. Secondly, that there is no provision in our law for appeals to the High Court to be dismissed for want of prosecution, they must be dealt with in accordance with section 325 of the Criminal Procedure Code. That is to say, the appellate judge must examine the 10 record and deliver a reasoned judgment on appeal. In view of these irregularities we allow the applicant's application for an extension of time in which to appeal to this court, and will treat it as the appeal. The appeal is allowed, and the case will be sent back to the same or equivalent judge of the High Court for the hearing of this appeal in 15 that court. Appeal allowed 1981 ZR p286