Benjamin Musembi Nganda & Josephine Muthini Nganda v Bakulesh Chandrakant Jani & City Council of Nairobi [2013] KEHC 6610 (KLR) | Costs Award | Esheria

Benjamin Musembi Nganda & Josephine Muthini Nganda v Bakulesh Chandrakant Jani & City Council of Nairobi [2013] KEHC 6610 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CIVIL DIVISION

CIVIL CASE  NO. 300  OF 1999

BENJAMIN MUSEMBI NGANDA

JOSEPHINE MUTHINI NGANDA...........PLAINTIFFS

VERSUS

BAKULESH CHANDRAKANT JANI

CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI ..........…DEFENDANTS

R U L I N G

On 20th December 2011 this suit was marked withdrawn.  The issue of costs was left to Court to determine.  Submissions on the same were made for the Plaintiffs and the 2nd Defendant.  There was no appearance for the 1st Defendant during arguments on costs despite service of notice.   I have considered the arguments made.

The withdrawal of the suit by the Plaintiffs was informed by the fact, as submitted by their learned counsel, that the suit property was sold by a third party in the year 2007, a financial institution, in exercise of its statutory power of sale.  The substratum of the suit thus disappeared without the Plaintiffs’ fault.  But it was quickly conceded that it was not the 2nd Defendant’s fault either!

For the 2nd Defendant it was submitted that costs follow the event, and in this case there was no cause to deny the 2nd Defendant its costs.

Under Section 27(1) of the Act costs are at the discretion of the Court or Judge.  However, under the provisoto that subsection, costs of any action, cause or other matter or issue shall follow the event unless the Court or Judge shall for good reason otherwise order.

The event here is the withdrawal of the suit, not the reason for the withdrawal.  The Plaintiffs having withdrawn their suit they must bear the costs thereof.  The Plaintiffs appear to appreciate this legal position as their learned counsel stated during arguments that they have pleaded for the Defendants’ kind understanding on the issue of costs to no avail.

I find no good reason to deny the 2nd Defendant its costs of the suit and I award the same.  I make no order as to costs of the 1st Defendant.  It is so ordered.

DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013

H. P. G. WAWERU

JUDGE

DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013