Crown v Getari wa Kachuqu (Revision Case No. 22 of 1927) [1927] EACA 20 (1 January 1927)

## CRIMINAL REVISION.

Before SHERIDAN, J.

## **CROWN**

$\boldsymbol{v}$ .

GETARI wa KACHUQU. Revision Case $22/1927$ .

Employment of Natives Ordinance (Cap. 139), section 2definition of servant.

$Held$ :—That a clerk is not a servant as defined in Section 2.

ORDER.-The evidence in this case shows the accused to have been employed as a clerk. A clerk does not come within the definition of servant in the Employment of Natives Ordinance (Cap. 139, section 2, Laws of Kenya).

The conviction is therefore set aside and the fine ordered to be repaid.

Note.-A similar Order was made by Sheridan, J., in Revision Case No. 43/1927.