Director of Public Prosecutions v Peter Lloyd Mwape (Appeal No. 12 of 1987) [1987] ZMSC 100 (12 July 1987)
Full Case Text
, . .oJ; IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ZAMBIA, ,;tf:'dii\g such prcpsrty <l!.d U!le or. Appeal No. 12 of 1987 .. · 'i i . ~ar.~per, '. . J. s .• ' del,1 v,re<1,:;th11, J.~~Q,,l\i19frh~9U.~!i !l 1'i ci) th.:~ :~.h#,I},fil'l _t.i1~t. ·!-''. i'!-,' 'J''W'i _;.;1·1 fl. ,..,.11·;" 11@<l r'>,,:,~n 'i.i~ /'_~.,) ·y,.,:· ·•~· 1!J~f~~-. -'.:i':·r~·-~· .:'.,,i-';,( \,' i:. ,-., ~,,,.,,.;lh. ,. •. < ; ' j ... ;This appeal,,: invc,lvi.ng ;th~,, c~;~~ o_f,,J>~~!!\'.', !,;I,01,t~ape_,,,.is;;~Y:;c,·:~c1 · r" (•'I 1 ·f i-i•; !'. ,,r .. :,"> . , , ,.,, :,i :~ ,: ,_,; )'· ,,.,, -~~-V>~:.4-:--'•<,•l- *••·_, •• _,.~•~-;- i._'h-:, __ ii-,Jc ~:,· tt'"'. ~-- ,,,-, •.• , ,\.•, ,,..,\:~,_. ,~1i,rl ~ .. ! , the Director of Pub•Hc Prosecutio~s against the finding by the : . . learned trial judge that the gun.produced in.the trial was .not the gun used in the actual shooting·of,,the'complainant,)and(the: '.',<r,;·,,:.,.;t. Ln, consequent reduc:tfon: ot· the ·ch,·~r.ge; !Jli!l pr91juc9.(!. ,ii~, ,en _e.xl1 Wi\J,p · . :} : : c:m,: t !iiJ'.: Ui:1 mi,~ th,li; h,ad b{!{i!U. IJS£ro iW'i:!.!~ily to $~CO!";_ .tpe ,:t;J'llp}fl:itf~ilt;'. t' .• ,' ' For convenience_;l'I,~ ·WiJt r:'tf,e_rGttRs ~~e tCf!flYJcte,d ;,R~,'1. S!>i1~~~~n~1D}1.,;J •. respondent in this, ca~e •. a~thoug~,i,~~i.~~.s ;H'.9S.~;aPp!)~l.~l.:~gatn.f~ i,\ ~tie i~\I'. i rl~ i J19 , 9.f: • j;h~ JE!~,r.,H~~ J!'i,~Js J. Hq9J,:;J : t[1a t .. th1iil;'fi, 11,ll.l; eli ld;,':nfil.ri. _ti'l~t- • :,:•:' ' ,\! :t;<.',~f :i ·,:' •_'' :,:•. <:a, ';• t" n ~~-·•d t--.<~r-,\·, t1 C'.';9l c<1'r.1'(tf:$~rif,: -w~~-·no ·tHiiitl··•i;tr·{}t'-hrli:{h·~· t>i'.°hu.~',,1q.\t('jj1;'•·t\r".r#~~--····:. The facts of this case are that the respondent was charged •with .. · · aggravated robbery contrary tg ,$1!Ctipn ?~t .(2) .9,f ::1;~~1 p,en_al SC;i.~~.••i.~hlil·,:i2r particulars of the_ offencf3. b~;P.!fr:th!lt,on rt.~e,J5~h. 1qf 1,J.,~i:ie,0 W~9.,•,i.:,~.'t:i:I Lusa~a, jointly arid wh i 1 ~.t,,a!=.ti .!19::tPg~~.ti~'\ ,~! ~~);;1i5911J1~. per,sori,s! ,~l'~nown and * amed with_a fireal111,- he;di!lrst~ali.on,,fia:t mp.tqfi ca.r,,~o~:~:th cash and persa,al property to i;he tqtal. valu~ pf,K~. 110 19Q! ,.the ,ij~J,of. · "~'. O • :., ,, •,•. ,,.__,!.ii',; - ' ·-. '. ,'C' ,'~:. C• . ,;:;·.• . .:,i/, . .- , ,,(·,, -.•, ; '•', _,;I f., ';'. . : _ • . ,' ' I - .2 --.,· 0 Qi ' . • .. ; , · ~ , . t :.;1 :,,-r:.'. H ' . • '.1. ,' -·-. : , ' ;iJ-; ·1 ~{.- -:':~l-,:::r_. ·::hatj.t_~yC..-.~)tt,1 H;· ~J?-\t.hct. Cosmas Kazimoto and at the time of stealing such property did use or/ th rea en to use. ac~~a . -.~/ f~?-f ~.~l' t /,1:v·,J l1'~\; :ti'! ,\ny' :6v&'iW rf ~ii.,/:-.:~: 1.'~.'~•-~~1_, The prosecution evidence was to the.'effect thatrthe;cQmplafoci.11 had his vehicle stolen from him at gun point and,was,s1Jotc,at.1:iT.1Jr~~?1i7.f hours after the theft the respondent was found i~ the back sea,t <>f:.fh.!!r};'.' stolen motor vehicle,. and, when .a police off1cer~0quest1oned h~lil,;:i#fwas !' noticed that he had gun wrapped in a·•white,pap~r;-Wh~ch,,was ta~en:.a~ay from. him after a struggle .with the polic1f off1c~r~e ;A baUhtt~ii\1,, officer identified the gun 1)-5 having armtssing, parti fr:om, it whl<;. IJ,imMe it doubtful whether it could be used for firing,, .. The complaln~nt,was taken to hospital and found to be• suffering:'fr.om. gun. shot.,wounds,i,.,, Subsequently at an identification parade he· identified the respondent hi b as av ng een · .: ',. il t·· ' · ;~;-;!t'.'i>-,2~1en\. '~11.r> tt~·'.tti:j•:t.~J?- ;)f ,f,k·:>f-t;i~(i\lt• .. ,.,,'_·/; , :;-· '·,.:;•-,.-.~•,!-, •··, ~;,-',' ;_•\; ',• ft '1-s. 1 ~V.1•:~ti imrmf~tWl~t-- J:t,i <~i,;4ifft\iljf{,-,;-i · '_ In considering the evldencEl.;t~(~}~frr.? .. d tr~A~ t,!.1dPt)1~l~1i,t{h;,.t .)ri:: there was doubt as to whether, although the. complainant was,,an·honest/' :·· ··:,:( :\.,(<·'•'.·,.'~iYl!_/;i·;,ti;\i'._'.'' ·, witness, he had sufficient opportunity to ob.serve .t.he respQndent:to·'> · ··:t·; :1~;:,;1,y"•:t't°,'t.,-,J;,•~·,\ .. 'l•;•"/!-<;_,4!"' r-~~).',1-1~,t\·.l:/. : ... ·· .. · ...... ,•_, . i. ·': '. . . :· ~Sa• _an .: Ji . . ·; ... -~~..,;r~ · "l hisa. · . · •'. ., .. , , ·· '°·:;,:·,, ,.-.•,:,,, •,, "l ,JJ"~ ·_. · !/•.·.,•., : '•· .. ' ._, • ·.· .~- -.'-: '•' ,_. ·. . ·. · , , . . . ' { ' :, ' :, . . . . f ,, •,/, ,,· :;~ ·,.',, ·· .. '· ,,-._; ,:·.-.~.: :.' r ·- .... -· :: - ···: ,_. .. _,.,· .. ,., .. -.. made it saf~1 iP. rely o_n_ ti]~ . identif~R~r,1_?TT~t-iiAt \W'.~;;i!ii;~j("fi~:/:: ;J;;~} learned trial A~89t fp~n,d . ~h11t,;~h,e r~s~Rn~~~~}~d ,B~~n- ,.1.~,&~~;~8ki,.:i,~)tiillf possess 1 on of the, !l)ptor c~ r thr1~' ~~H!tffi:t~f 1~~-}h.t;\~;~~R~ ;,?tr~1lf11~[~~~il trial judge went on, t~. s~y ~h,,~ · 17f ,,w~F,,s\,i~ .~a\\~'~'~ 1,~~i~\1;':,~?,ijft'Ji}~at ·. . was p~oduced in, cour.t was,~~~?~~l]ii;n:h~f1-~.,~,?~1;>~,~:~~;:~.~~\.~nA~li~ti,¾~<i;R.'.l .. ; OOTplamarrt, but she d}d f,1('d '.a,,,t~~tt~~tffl~9~P,l~!,n~~t11~1e,JP~1j~~,?,~~::,;::::·:: sht ·•···H--,.:t'••·'~·-.,·•·l_ ....... -,, · -;. \\~_::. ~- t:'r~f;'l~ (.1-( · 1, ~{, : t~ij.~:;,ce·rnr.~-0,,:;iU~Y~~t~c{t~{h¼-i)?:t(~ii;t~f~J}. o '" In his appe~Tl6'~fo;e '.u~ '\11i1:}J~~n;~J~if e2ibt:~~6~1~J¥1;ii~tisr~t( has argued that, whether C>r not t~e''gun 'produced as_·an exhibJ}tJf -: >, > .. there was evidence, wh l.!=~ w~s . ~,u ~ye~;.~Y, Jhe 1}r;f ~ 1 Ju~~~ ,·:tii;~s¥RP~~Eicf court was. the one. that had been used act11iiuy to shoot' the ,CO~,Riainant:/ ;_ ,''' : r::~:-,'; :'.· ; r" ·.t:,/1';~71'),~~-fr'i~--- ',,, L' ·. 1_ '--' i'' f,,:~-.- by medical evidence, that t~e complainant hac,l in. fact been shot;,,-in . ··. -· , the circumstances therefore it was argued.that th.ere·was evid~nce that .-··:.r1t_.:n~/t."--,.~'~:.-,,1:·?r some gun had been ;,use.d a~j:her~ \t~~}q:;?~p~;\t"1:Rri~iiThl$~~~f\r,~~g~~ce( 'i-'~·,.·.~,\(l'.,t-,-'11 :: 1, '.'.\,':',.'•,,\,·:•· ·_:,_,:••. ;,,:, ·.· 'In ~ep ly; Mr:'. Sima~g~ ;'1l~ai 'ltf i:ouiiSel'oH~~,ii~lfr'q1', t.11~fr~~pon~ ~rg.!00 tilat tl-e~ lfclS • 1~1~1~ ~,~ ·in dfca:s~11df :~ih.fs'l}i~tJ:r~'!~''~!p~JF~':::1: . a conviction, in t~at ext'raneit{,'~~idenci•·such'1i~?~peiit¥caririg~i h}iirtii1,i ' -::i_Y-~;;i/:/, cases· should have been adduced before the"Court1·· Jn·~:r,s·•cro~~t~PPeal;-:):t (1'~••;_1-;_'.-,, •. 1,i~,--~•/l.•.\,''>-"-•j':'.i;r,,1·,::-.-:;J;.:;.:,- Mr. Simango argued that in any event there:was insufficientl.~~id~nce''·'·C: ·against the respondent,· 1,n thi\t·therresptmdent1 was':.found:·oiiTy sitting · . .:,, . ,·;:J-;.. ln the back seat and_ th~. ,{_q1'l~..\t'P?Sses~lon'·three hoHts'' li!-ter' was, l!Ot)'.t, -~ 1'1•· ~-:·:.· tt--.;'.,t~r<''.~~-~L::.:•t1:': -~s-nl}~·ti\'ii:tt.-~ · ..... :··,•,r-;·"J.'·,-';)r~hfl,,1 .. , , • f \ . ' \.<,.'.>·.::,.,~.~~ . .:_,'·f.: -.-:;• ~~-i..-:-~,,r1\~".\ · 4 ,\,i·~ 1,r~1,i-;-··, ,,.-\-'>··\~:y}.•·-- :~. ~~,'- .. i~r-.:~.,,- .. ~•• .. --,,:-, · .. •;,_.,~.~·;,0,•1'-t'' ··· ·., :'·)f ·,,,·:_-·,,•1 'i,<_".',.-;:.\•J,; 1.''.,!.::1i::;--~••';.•t1 · ·· - ·:,·-·. --,. _.. •·!: ,, '; \"' :-1:'.:c,'·:•r :;; ·.:::,J. Y''i\fl.f,?l'l:i.- .:-.···:-'.•i:·•.;· · 1,;, i·;. ~ ,_.,.,,., i _r·,r i,. ;l <; :r:,::•.n1,1, (/(.'. _.,.••-·:., • .• ..,_ • ..._ .. ,-,~;•·. ,.:,..-,i1.:·,)'>:.., _-,~··~•.:t;• •• -~-~ !,1-t',. , . . · i · · , - . . "· .... ';•:· '·'.,_: . .,.,.:-;• .. ,. •; '~;;_ t-·(',·,.;. ·)'!_,_·•,' . - .)·~,•---: t_h1_<.' .• -,.;,., : • - , , · . · .• :. r·-- _ .... ;•,_~- ·,::' · , .y· , _ 1: ·._. -·-· '' :•• · .. ,, ... :· .. ,~ - . L ·-. · · • · . . , · , . , .•. . ' '. · · ; .. ; ... . :;>:'t .. : .. ; .,+ :Iil)lijr lilTl'l~ \' 3/so.~.~-~ •• ;.'./f\t :.·::.-;> •>/::~7.i~_?· ,-~.•\.- .;v/\.- .. /:{t0it~Vi- ' ' ' ' • • • " ' ' .. \ ! - • • • •• I _.. , . . . . \ :: ' ' •,I_. : • " . I, . . . . , .·. :,· ·-•i ,,.• .: ., . \,l ':,'. . ·,: '· · ··.1: . ·· ,:_ :., \ • • '_.,:-.-·: · . · '-:• · ' . -..:::, :·,;:(.'\ •.:·. '_ • • . . . ,_,:, .,, L . . Ni.cl" / ' 'l•·' ·,' 11., .'· ,<f('.;.:i'• . ,1··' I·:,;, :,'.'\. , __ ,:.-('j': .:,·.:•,,,:•: · .. · , . ,;:_.-,-, . -~·:1'·,.<··,. • .• -";'.,.:,·'.1· . . ' ,;/ •;: ·,,-,;,_',,', •,, .·,• . . .. , :- r~~,~-: :ry:· rNt!·::,.: ·.,i,! • i_• r :r i:·:·:- - :: :,.:"-,,•-:----·._::-:.~----_:}\~}}~ll\; .•-"1-1·:i~i;;rr\~.:• .. .-,,:. It iSJi,:'ten trom11-t~mfal_':.t9:i! ·certain ;: so recent as to exclude any inference other than·.;i;heiguilt of 'tne:t ':"f·,,,,,1,. respondent. Mr; Si mango further· argued that ;-fri· ;any\ev~·ntF1tiwaf .~.: •· i,~lt] unfair of the learned trial judge· to ·disbelie)ie<the 1rei~bnderit;l~ri~-~ < :!' he said that he was merely accepting•:a:.ilif'f1in;the stolen vehicle.; .:;~. ••;1:t' . ,•. ,· · ~--.•. ,: --·: .; , ... · .. · ,'. x ;-,, -_· .. :;·'.}i~;f7}€~.:zi As so frequently happens, · 1 n . ,~hts _case• there,• seems t~ : be s,om~~i& ·::. misapprehension. as to what us,~, <;,~n A!l' m~~-~;or,<ev 1 dance c,f ', re~~n{.:<;: ;:',/4:f-•' possession in a case of thi~iJ~flt~-~e.~ ,, 1~av,ec;.~~id }t bet,qr::El, ,~A~::~e • repeat that, when there is evt~~nce • offi.~enti fica~1on, from- an,,~9p,est, , witness, a doubt as to th.e r'eliabil ity :of suctii:evidence •because 'of · ·. · poor opportunity to observe can be remedied•·by:;st1pporting,eviden<:e of something more which consists of ~ connecti~g ·Hnk betwee~ th~ respondent and the offence. In that event the qt1e.s!f;ion ·of how:recent 1'< ·., is the possession, is ~l!IJlla}~r~aL extent what expl~na,:t,19n; str~.:r~S_P,99</~pt gaye. ~~~t iS i~pprtan,~i;tt/·: > that the po~si~jJJ-prel.ii~le J~ent,i.ficilt!9!l, ~,Yj~~-~~~. J~)!'lil~!!;illB9~~;~¥ ••. supporting ~Vitjf!n~e Of <:O~.riep,tf~n :WJ~n ,ilO ti~tll :~f;j·~n:H. Q\1;~:f:;:i~,~i~r;it\, Mr. s i ma~gc,' s J~rgunients ,<,;_9npern Ing any ,def e'.fl,:1.i!:2~:'N11:i::'rKi,1~I?t~:• g.f{jl/[~I _ . ,_ recent posse.~sinn would only apply if. the:,recentfipc,ssession 1te,ref;t!Jf!\~ole · reason fcir t:n~ pon\'.~CtlO~'., .. ~sJe, .. ~!J!,l()i~teq out, ~ll~t is, -~~1;\}~~!::9~'~( here ... T~e . eyJ cle,n~e :to s.~ppprt e:t~~t1~~V.if!ilW\ ~t 1:h~,:.,r1:1enpe ,:9r J:I:fi,}!)),,) identification by a~ h(l~,ef~ Wi\n,,~~,;'~MPPClnYl~}Y'. ~~e, t~,t~t-co.~~i5J:l~:~:/ ':• ·with tttei.stolen vetii<:1,e.·.t~f p~viate\any pp5sibl ity,'. of;.flone'st:1m{sta~~:i{~;;.'f.: -, 1. Therefore so far as ~cro~s-:aP,P,~al is_ concerned, we 'ar~'. g\{J}>~h~~~;lsfie~. · that there was ~µfficient evide,r:ice ,to just,1f/i-i-:fie'1co~vl'ctitin'To¥Eth?i. Qf'd£ re?pon~ent and j,1,!~ fros~-appe11,l ,is cllSl)\i.~s~ci. _. ·•·-. :·_ · . · • ,(/. Y.\t,, .. · -. . ,:;., -.: iir-, '. _ ,.: ';,:'>(·. : . ,·,;\1Afif;\\,¼~< .,.t:Ji'.f:{;i},:i½;r:::< ' So far as the ·appeal by the learoad•i·D1 rector: O:fi•Public ,~Joos. , ,, . .,,,;,:{'t:}·/::;(/''.' :.>~f,.i .', i '•i ' , . ' , I Jf~~_,;·• .. >,:•,~,t',,·.: Is concerned we are bound to Sity :that, wh~re .t.her:e .is''evi.denc.e,;,of,;;gun ·_, shot wounds, that .t.111 suffir.e· to support a :charge '.of having '>cariHe.d:i.·;''''" ,'.,_.·'·.,·,1;';?,\''•:·_.';; out .. ~ro~bery with the)1ttRf ~f}fE!,~!'.;IJI• :,_J,t·":iS c~r~ai,J1lY: not,!l~f,~~~~rt that aifirearm or otl:lereYi,(f.~nc~lUfh As .,sp,~~ <;ArtrlA~es shout,.d:',!i,;'. ',, · produced and idE!n~~f:i~!t ~ri ~u~r:~J!'C,\ll!!~l~l)(;~S. with _Mr. Si mango th,~_\/1WM,;~,Mt'1tial-{9::ff9E!t,~9;.,,~µ;ip,~,r}J;~),~,~.~~gf:9:f\. ,' . this nature for the're to -b~,a~e,~u~.i1):~YJ~~~i~ ,~r,:1:#~-:~,~).,ifipe:~\~l;½{i1{\/ In this case tl:l,E!, -~~pl~i,:ia,nt 'c~ '~-~l~-~~<;.~, t~~l);?f-1-!a~\:~.h~~;;:\:i:\~.(;,;;:; firearm. :s.uppol'ted by medical evid.ence • to that effect~ was\uodoubtedly sufficient:. to support a charge of armE!q aggravated robbE!rY• under section294(2) · of the Penal Code. learned Director of Public P.ros.ecutions is all.owe_d. · · -~/:{~i~f t}:::'~0\i . •' ,., It foH.ows therefore that· the appeal by th~ Joie ;if P,:il~r~e,ho,~~,r.~r';,I · · · -· '''t•'/ ~ ·-• ', ,'-.:-,~,1;i/<-'.·.,'.,_,··:· ·,.·!,":,':--· ·1,r,/'-:\),::;·,·,rH'.it'·',f'f~W~---•!', ... ''.•1 /:'i: ·:_,' ..... ::.1_···· '.··,u~y-'.·:•\'1·;.'•,-,:·,·.', ·_-•:1"''\~'.;'•'),:•,.·,··, ,.• ':i ',.:. ,·I· • • ,'. ' ·•_if•;..,,•,•,-'~1, ·., ."j _., . . ' . /. . ;'. .,, .. · , : ' i . ' .... :.---:- :,· • ...... '/~:·· f y ,: ,.,, .. _., .. , ' •- . , · , ' . ' . • \ ' • -,:{~("'i:,1.'," .. -·,, /. ' . . -~-' . •_;,, S· ',·.-•--"' ,,'!/'./::'(-, ,,, ;_. ::';·.\, .. , '·.. ··. '. / . · · ·: .:,- ·}.<:. i (, .. •. : ·,· :., ,, . -. ·' -. : • ' . ' ,' , ,1 ,,._ 1•.,• ',, ·; •,- ·_ , • · .,. ; . ' .'· '. '. '. • . . . . . ,. , ' · ·; ' ' · . . ~ . . ' ' - ' ; ,' . , , , " • • ' , , ·, ' ' ' • • i , , ' • I , , , , , , ' - ,-_•1·• 'l :.::":¼ ·. -,~ ··,h: ,;?·~ 1,~;~~~! • . . ':,,,;, l Q i. . .- • ·t ! . ' 1 h 1 :> i'lf';-:•~::-d ~ , i nvo l v i.f(J, t!'.•t~i.~ , · · ,-, · ','<!'"'.:t.1.\•'f:,:i:'t ·,, r • 1, ,·':.tJ,\-.. ~c , '. , i '1 , ,1i:tije.1_) ~-.\cicHJtinfJ" tJf' -the· c1,~11P:liiinant,. --·a.ntj· \no -· • ; ; ; · ·.···-•- ·- :: :"":"':'%t,, ':,<; •. f,:;,W::'.,{:iikE (;~~-$~1~ i,f .f.~~;,r. •I..~;jiti··~~i~;~~~:,'~ -~~~ .•l•!t:~:-.i~,t•:i:;·_~\ ·)'· :'( ·tH•.4. H-r:t ·•.ii' ' '"' ;,t;; ;;·:r·(i ! r) ACTING• 1SUPREME ,COURJ\JUDGE ·:-:" .. , _··:;;!;ii~~{f:~ti~:t ~.::;n u:~·\; Li1 L;·:_~ cons~qL,•zr,t. rriducti&n oi' the. crnt.ru~~. · ,/ ' '. ;,r/ · 'i"M'~i (t·"•Chai-la•' -.:;,-;•, . . .. ··· ,., · , r·r'(;":-;-;'.':. Ht ., ' ,,,{_11l,fl..,.t. ,,. <··1· ... , •.• , :.·· .. · t.:C l !.. J: ,(•· ' n;;spr.mdl',nt iii this;. (;,JS;!)' ·t.-½.i_i u • H,v- c,y;v;:onn.;nca we wll i rllttr..-i;o: the convit.";t\_i!4:l ~~t$_OIJ: ~-$ !~~'1ft1[1:!;f itl tho:igl\ ,he hd. er.o!;S~~f)peale(Fagitnil'.~j.':;'.,J)/·;• ·:'_.., ·: ~r~~ r:<~:;;:·; :,.,:_·:: :.:_:. ··:: •:.~:;·.~;;:,;(-,i\<t.~;_)-·:;; .. » .. vi'''' ',·, • '. .. ·' •,.,,,,,,., '·· '•'"'' ,,,,.,,.,, · ·-.: t -~'.·f_-. t/:~\~_i}\t _· ...... ;: :··:.':i:;~i:?\1;;:.~;--·;8j·:.'.,,_;_~:.·. ·1· r'i. • l · 4,··, .. ;~~- ---> : ·. o. _.,.,; '"'':I'"',:. , , (·, .f "-.""--,,·! l '"":-~.•.'t',''o' " "'. .m, :"-t-" J ,,, •. ;.11·. ,,,,_:.,. , : • : ", : ... • .. _,:_. ,,_·_ .. :~ . " • ,_: '-: Ttie \",,:·,,. of thh c:ilS<l are th,rt the resp-mid~nt w~s·cttarg~d. wJth, il<JFi"l.lVil.t$:ci r-cbbsry umtrary t,::, · SeCt;ior. l!S4 (2) # tl1i/P~nal;.cl;$.i{-tl}i pc.ri;iCJJl<l-1'$ ,,,. tlli;, offp,nce beln!J-.•tll~t /Jlktl'lf.l lSt~;~f',)'une, 19/30,<i)·~t;;f~\; \ _.;·:<,_>': Luf.a!rn, jointly and wlltlst 1.1ctif'1g, tqg~tl'ltl':;l(<it!lc,,,s~-p~rsons,,Qn_ki1Qlr{!l', ; .-, t.lT','!i'J ¥,lth a fireil'rt:i, h~ :o1i$. /i't~ul · ufi,i!i- flat ·lilt\tor car ~ ~tlL'> and i1i:•'.i°t-l c:,,.~11 c,1,j p0·,~(;mj pl"Oj,P.l'ty tc, th~ totaleVatu~ IJf. 1<3, 140~00; tli\:l pt~f'of;) ·, _,. ' ' ·1· •r\\· .. '/ '(·~·,:, -_-.. :. ~ I ' .. -: .. s _It,',· './"' . ;',":: ,· :·. .•. ·,.' • •• " • , · , , , ' ,. - - " • ' ' ' - - ••• • /2 Cos.rrias Kazi mo to