D.J. LOWE & COMPANY LIMITED v CREDIT AGRICOLE INDOSUEZ & 2 others [2010] KEHC 311 (KLR) | Withdrawal Of Suit | Esheria

D.J. LOWE & COMPANY LIMITED v CREDIT AGRICOLE INDOSUEZ & 2 others [2010] KEHC 311 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT MOMBASA

CIVIL CASE NO. 235 OF 2010

D.J. LOWE & COMPANY LIMITED …………………………….PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

CREDIT AGRICOLE INDOSUEZ …………………………1ST DEFENDANT

BANK OF AFRICA KENYA LIMITED …………...…….….2ND DEFENDANT

REGISTRAR OF TITLES, MOMBASA …………….…….3RD DEFENDANT

RULING AND/OR DIRECTIONS

A fundamental issue has arisen in respect of the application dated 30. 10. 2010 by the 1st Defendant and which all parties agree will have crucial consequences or ramifications depending on the findings of the court in the court record.

The question is whether H.C.C.C. No. 35 of 1997 (Mombasa) is still pending or whether it was ever withdrawn or discontinued.

In paragraph 16 of the plaint dated 7th July, 2010 the plaintiff states on oath (through Verifying Affidavit) H.C.C.C No. 35 of 1997 has been withdrawn by the plaintiff and therefore the plaintiff states there are no pending proceedings between the parties herein in connection with the same subject matter.

By a letter dated 20th October 2010 the Deputy Registrar of the High court at Mombasa in response to an inquiry by the 1st Defendant’s advocate wrote:-

“C.B. Gor & Gor

Advocate

MOMBASA

RE: HCCC No. 35 of 1997 D.J. LOWE & CO. LTD –V- BANQUE INDOSUEZ & ANOTHER

………………………………………………………………………

I have perused the entire above-mentioned court file but did not see any notice of withdrawal of suit.

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

HIGH COURT – CIVIL

MOMBASA”

Upon adjournment at the last appearance of the matter in court, I carefully looked through the voluminous court file but did not find any Notice of withdrawal or discontinuance of the above-mentioned suit.

In the circumstances, the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to prove that it duly filed such a notice. Such a Notice must be stamped upon payment of requisite filing fee. After that, it must be served on the Defendants for it to be effective.

A discontinuance of a suit is termination of the entire suit while withdrawal usually refers to withdrawal of parts of a claim or suit. A withdrawal of the entire suit can be construed to be in effect a discontinuance.

In view of the foregoing and in the absence of any evidence of the alleged withdrawal of HCCC No. 35 of 1997, I find as a matter of fact that HCCC No. 35 of 1997 has not been withdrawn as alleged to date and the same is pending.

If the said suit related to the subject matter in this suit then it follows that some legal consequences/implications may arise and which the court may have to consider and address.

I will therefore invite counsel to give their views as to the way forward and the implications. In particular the court will have to be told the possible effect of this on the 3 pending applications and the entire suit.

Dated at Mombasa this 16th day of December 2010.

M.K. IBRAHIM

J U D G E