DKN v CKN [2023] KEMC 168 (KLR)

DKN v CKN (Divorce Cause E719 of 2021) [2023] KEMC 168 (KLR) (1 August 2023) (Judgment)

Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 168 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts

Divorce Cause E719 of 2021

JP Aduke, SRM

August 1, 2023

Between

DKN

Petitioner

and

CKN

Respondent

Judgment

1. The Petitioner filed the petition dated 20th May 2021 seeking a divorce on the grounds of adultery, cruelty and desertion. Return of service on record shows that the respondent was served with the petition and annexures thereto. The respondent entered appearance but did not file a response. The petitioner filed an application seeking to have the divorce cause proceed undefended. Return of service on record shows the petitioner served the respondent with the said application. The proceedings proceeded undefended.

2. The brief facts of the case are as contained in the petition on record. In summary, DKN and CKN solemnized their marriage on 8th February 2008 at Nairobi Academy officiated by a marriage officer. They have two issues together from the union. Both the petitioner and respondent are domiciled in Kenya. The parties have no intentions of salvaging this marriage. The particulars of the grounds for divorce are outlined in the petition as follows:1. Adultery.2. Cruelty.3. Desertion.

3. At the hearing thereof, the petitioner relied on the petition and pleadings on record as evidence in support of the petition for divorce. Notably, the petitioner averred that the contents of the petition remained true as at the date of the hearing. The petitioner prayed that the petition be allowed.

5. The issue for determination before this court is whether or not the marriage between the parties merits an order of divorce under The Marriage Act, 2014 (hereafter, the Act).

6. The applicable law is s s.65(dissolution of Christian Marriages) of the Act which provides that the court may grant separation or divorce on the following grounds:1. Adultery by the other spouse.2. Cruelty by the other spouse.3. Desertion by the other spouse.4. Exceptional depravity by the other spouse.5. The irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.

7. I have considered the particulars of the grounds outlined in the petition and how those have contributed to the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as contemplated under s.65 of the Act. I have also noted the length of physical separation of the couple herein, and relied on the reasoning of the court in JSM v ENB[2015]. With respect to intention to salvage the union, I have noted the unequivocal terms of the petition on lack of such intention. The reasoning of the court in ENC v SNK[2015] eKLR cannot be emphasized enough- " this is a marriage that appears to be on paper only, the same having irretrievably broken down on account of the desertion. The desertion has no doubt occasioned mental and emotional anguish and pain. I am therefore satisfied that the grounds for dissolution of the marriage have been established. " Seeing as this court cannot force two adults to live together when there is no more love between them, I allow the petition dated 20th May 2021 on the following terms:1. The marriage between the two be and is hereby dissolved.2. Decree nisi do issue to be made absolute in 30 days.3. This being a family matter, each party to bear own costs.

ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATEJUDGEMENT DATED AND SIGNED THIS 1ST AUGUST 2023In the presence of:1. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe2. Counsel for the Petitioner-3. Counsel for the Respondent: