Dominic Kyalo Munyoki v Republic [2014] KEHC 1857 (KLR) | Narcotic Drug Offences | Esheria

Dominic Kyalo Munyoki v Republic [2014] KEHC 1857 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.  5 OF 2013

DOMINIC KYALO MUNYOKI …………………………….APPELLANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC  ……………………………………………………RESPONDENT

(Being an appeal from the original conviction and sentence in Makueni Criminal Case No. 26 of 2013 by Hon. Yator, AG SRM on 22/1/2012)

JUDGMENT

Dominic Kyalo Munyoki, was charged with two (2) counts;

Count 1- Trafficking Narcotic Drugs (bhang) contrary to Section 4(a) of the Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substance Control Act No. 4 of 1994.

Count 2– Possession of forged currency note contrary to Section 359 of the Penal Code.

He was convicted on his own plea of guilty and sentenced as hereunder:-

Count 1 -  3 years imprisonment

Count 2-   2 years imprisonment

He now mitigates on sentence on the grounds that he has a wife and three (3) children who solely depend upon him.

The State opposed the application and called upon the court to uphold the sentence.

It behooves this court being the first appellate court to reconsider the trial court’s record and come to its own conclusions.

This court can only interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial court if it is evident that the court acted upon some wrong principles or overlooked some material facts or if the sentence was manifestly harsh or excessive in the circumstances.  (see Wagunda versus Republic [1983] KLR 569).

The penalty provided for the offence of Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs is a fine of One Million Shilling or three times the market value of the Narcotic Drug or Psychotropic Substance, whichever is the greater, and, in addition, to imprisonment for life.

With regard to count 2, a person being found in possession of forged currency is liable to imprisonment for seven (7) years.

The sentence imposed in respect of count 2 was within the law.  The sentence imposed in count 1 was not within the law.  However, the State having not sought enhancement, I find the appeal on sentence lacking merit.  I therefore dismiss the appeal and confirm the sentence passed on in respect of both counts.

It is ordered.

DATED, SIGNED and DELIVEREDat MACHAKOS this 8THday of OCTOBER 2014.

L.N. MUTENDE

JUDGE