Edward Bernard Chanda v People (Appeal No. 17/89) [1989] ZMSC 128 (8 August 1989)

~ I ,;,r· • t•·J• • -I ' h II TD SUPBEME a>VR: 01' ZAMBIA ll>LDIII AT 1ABWE • • • ; \ '.· .. ,, . ' :: ,· ,:,i.; •. :. r''1i'.~.;1.,:1. ~ .. '• . ;I•' ~ ' ; •,·',·-' . : Upoa Id:• oOlffinioa• lut wa M~t•~oe4'· to·~ ... tb. -~ -.' Mr• Sek.al•· tv the apJellant iatiat•• to tbe ooan .. that h• would." a:,pe~ -~•ti~,,, .,...., -•r r"t ... _. ~, .. ,. ,• ,. , •""l • "tf ... ,- •·•• t+, ' . .. ' . ' ,:, ..... ;::_, )~"" . . •· . ·· .. · ... '' • .. :: : : erd.lu.r, aggravate-a roblMJ17.• Hr. a.1~. , he Seid.or Stat• AclYOaat••._'. ·-: ~·-~-. ' ·. ') :, ·: -·:· .'•~ .. ~~· · ,< · .. ,.:, , ... ~:.} •,· /nu·; -~t z:;- rt . . .. -?'-'.•'-/·;j;~\!\:; · .1. • • . : . ·. , t . ,: .):.; . . . . I ' j j· ~ .. , I· I has :conoeeded that J2- ' • "(f . . . ' stand ~alcen by Mr • . Phiri was a aorre9t one tn that there ·was no· •vide~ce ~hat the fire-arm. alleg;Jt;~i~ .wit~ th~ ;~pell~ni~ wae the fi~~~f;m as de.fiiiedT~'d~r'""'th~~~i~a~~~Act~·- ., l'hat being the ~ .. - . , , ... , · •. 'A a,, •• .. • .. . • • • \ + • • position Mr. Sakala has now abandoned the~·~ppeal against .. ordiD&cy aggravated:, r~bb~ri~ ~ 'The "(Jt~af t'~:J ;'tjd1'Jl;"!~~~ia~~-tc,otlis1ra correci; one in that there" is overwhelming· eviqenoo· ·to ·sustain~a ... 'conviction on ·. •• ~ ·· 1,• . ~•• ,~t::i ·t-J(l~r.~+ "¥ ~ ,- •·°;... ,,'. .. • . • I f""+, ,.... f•tt.. . . . ~ ' •· P·#,i,,. r. -·· ,::t·" "1·•,ro . . , · ·-: . .... , .. . , · __ j#-tt ?•.t . ordinary- aggravated robbery. · :rhat being .. the -·case~,we,•~therefore ~ allown.the"'!'; \ : <• \ ...... .:.1.-~ .i.~tua.l 1<f.,fli}.&G.e. to tha ~ 4 ~:i'r·-i~~- ,.. ~- ,,_. f\N!ttAt Ndlrt$. H t',, it~ bd.'!'!.-rt t~ ~ ............ • ................... ·~ .. . '. • • ,. • • • ' ~ ~-~·:. J .;;::1 ~1..,;,; .,_~\.\i: =~-D~•x~~(CHI~R. WA.&ttt.. l-' .. 1· .. ,t:~~'1':«.ic.. .;,~ ·:--·,:t 0,'1 ( '.'< >•,, 1t~.-:.:·t tr~t ~~ 'lt~'itl d ~ h;,,..;-,s.1.~.~ SUPREME COURT JUDGE . ~• r"' ♦ ;>•I ~ ·- ... , :..,_ ,. ' .