Emoni Ederit Logiel v Republic [2020] KEHC 7518 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT KITALE

CRIMINAL PETITION  NO. 3  OF 2018

EMONI EDERIT LOGIEL........PETITIONER

VERSUS

REPUBLIC................................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The Petitioner herein  has filed this petition   requesting this court to consider resentencing him pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another =Vs= Republic [2017] eKLRwhere the court held that:

“(69) Consequently, we find that section 204 of the Penal Code is inconsistent with the constitution and invalid to the extent that it provides for the mandatory death sentence for murder.”

2.  The petitioner was charged, convicted and sentenced to death for the offence of murder contrary to section 202as read withsection 203of thePenal Code (Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya) at a trial before the High Court at Kitale in Criminal Case No. 28 of 2005. He appealed against the conviction and sentence to the Court of Appeal in Eldoret Criminal Appeal No.  602 of 2010. The appeal was dismissed on 23rd May 2014 hence this petition.

3. The Petitioner now wishes to take advantage of the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu (Supra) for a re-sentencing.

4.  The learned Counsel for the Respondent, Mr Omooria in his submissions dated 14/01/2020 urged this court not to interfere with the sentence due to the fact that the deceased had met her death in a vile and cruel manner perpetrated by the Petitioner.

5. It is worth noting that the Supreme Court in the Muruatetu case,  considered that in re-sentencing in a case of murder, the following mitigating factors would be applicable as a guide namely:-

(a) age of the offender

(b) being a first offender

(c) whether the offender pleaded guilty

(d) character and record of the offender

(e) Commission of the offence in relation to gender-based violence.

(f) remorsefulness of the offender

(g) the possibility of reform and social-re adaptation of the offender

(h) any other factor that the court considers relevant.

6.  Under the Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016 (“the Guidelines”) published by the Kenya Judiciary state (at para. 4. 1), the courts are urged to consider  that the sentence imposed must meet the following objectives;

Retribution; To punish the offender for his/her criminal conduct in a just manner.

Deterrence; To deter the offender from committing a similar offence subsequently as well as discourage other people from committing similar offences.

Rehabilitation: To enable the offender reform from his criminal disposition and become a law abiding person.

Restorative justice: To address the needs arising from criminal conduct such as loss and damages.

Community protection: To protect the community by incapacitating the offender.

Denunciation: To communicate the community’s condemnation of the criminal conduct.

8.   I now wish to address the issue of the sentence imposed on the petitioner. In doing so, I have had  a look at various authorities and particularly the case of  Nelson Mwiti Gikunda & 2 Others =Vs= Republic [2018] eKLR  where Majanja J,re-sentenced the petitioners to 25 years imprisonment commencing from the date of sentencing.  The learned Judge had sought reliance in court of Appeal decisions in John Ndede Ochola alias Obago =Vs= Republic -KSM C.A Criminal Appeal No. 120 of 2014 [2018] eKLR and Jonathan Lemiso Ole Keni =Vs= Republic – NRB C.A. Criminal Appeal No. 51 of 2016 [2018] where the said courts upheld sentences of 25 and 30 years respectively.

9.  In the petition before me, the Petitioner has since served 10 years of the sentence. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code requires a sentencing court to take into account the period that a convicted person has spent in custody prior to the sentence. I note that the Petitioner remained in pre-trial custody for a period of almost 4 years from the time he was charged in 2005 upto the time he was convicted in 2009.

10. Taking into account the mitigating and aggravating factors, I have considered the entirety of the facts and therefore I hereby re-sentence the Petitioner to Twenty five (25) years’ imprisonment commencing from 28/10/2009.

Signed, Dated and Delivered at Kitale on this 3rd day of March, 2020.

________________

H. K. CHEMITEI

JUDGE

3/3/2020

In the presence of;

M/s Kagai for the Respondent

Applicant – present

Court Assistant – Kirong

Ruling read in open court