Equilab Technologies Limited v County Secretary, Nairobi City County, Chief Officer Finance/County Treasurer, Nairobi City County & Nairobi City County [2017] KEELC 591 (KLR) | Mandamus Against Government | Esheria

Equilab Technologies Limited v County Secretary, Nairobi City County, Chief Officer Finance/County Treasurer, Nairobi City County & Nairobi City County [2017] KEELC 591 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI

ELC JR. APPLN. NO. 45 OF 2017

EQUILAB TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED …......................... APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE COUNTY SECRETARY,

NAIROBI CITY COUNTY ……………………….……... 1ST RESPONDENT

CHIEF OFFICER FINANCE/COUNTY TREASURER,

NAIROBI CITY COUNTY ………...……..……..………. 2ND RESPONDENT

NAIROBI CITY COUNTY ………...…...……….………. 3RD RESPONDENT

RULING

1. I have considered the chamber summons application dated 14/11/2017 through which the applicant seeks leave of this court to commence proceedings for an order of mandamus directed at the respondents commanding them to pay the applicant the decretal sum and costs awarded in ELC 252/2015.  I have examined the annextures to the verifying affidavit.

2. Grant or refusal of leave is an exercise of judicial discretion.  The test to be applied is whether the applicant has made out an arguable case [see: UWE MEIXNER & ANOR V ATTORNEY GENERAL, (2005) eKLR].  Secondly, the purpose of the application for leave is to eliminate applications which are frivolous, vexatious or hopeless and to ensure that only those applications disclosing arguable cases proceed for further consideration.

3. The applicant herein obtained judgment on 26/2/2016.  The decree was issued on 16/5/2016. Its bill of costs was taxed in August 2017.  It contends that both the decree and the certificate of costs have not been satisfied.  It is trite law that normal execution proceedings through attachment and sale of assets would not issue against the government.  The one efficacious instrument of execution available to a decree holder such as the applicant herein is the writ of mandamus.

4. Consequently, I am satisfied that the applicant’s intended motion is not frivolous, vexatious or hopeless.  The applicant has made out an arguable case.  I accordingly grant leave in terms of prayer 1 of the chamber summons.  The substantive motion shall be filed and served within 21 days.   Mention on 25/01/2018 for further directions.

Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi on this 15th day of November, 2017.

B M EBOSO

JUDGE