The court held that the Magistrate's Court had no jurisdiction to review or set aside its order adopting the Land Disputes Tribunal's award as judgment. The statutory framework under the Land Disputes Tribunals Act limited the Magistrate's role to adopting the award and issuing a decree, with no discretion to examine the merits or legality of the Tribunal's decision. The appellant failed to utilize the prescribed appellate and review mechanisms under the Act and instead pursued an improper forum, which was rejected at all appellate levels. The application for review before the Magistrate's Court was not brought within a reasonable time and did not meet the requirements for review under Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court found no error apparent on the face of the record or discovery of new evidence. The appeal was therefore dismissed for lack of merit, and the appellant was held to the consequences of not following the statutory dispute resolution process.