The Court of Appeal found that the evidence did not establish fraud in the sale and transfer of the suit land. Both parties had signed blank forms for the Land Control Board consent and transfer, which were entrusted to their common advocate for completion and registration. The discrepancies in the transfer documents were deemed curable defects, not indicative of fraud or forgery. The standard of proof for fraud was not met, and the appellant was not prosecuted for any criminal conduct. The court held that the contract between the parties was valid and enforceable, as there was no coercion, fraud, or undue influence. The requirement for spousal consent did not apply to the transaction, as it predated the relevant statutory provisions. The 2nd respondent failed to prove the existence of a trust or any registrable interest in the suit land. Consequently, the High Court's judgment was set aside, and the respondents' suit was dismissed.