FREDRICK OENGA NYAMWEGA v HILLTOP TAXIS LTD & BARNABAS KIPROP LETING [2011] KEHC 494 (KLR) | Negligence | Esheria

FREDRICK OENGA NYAMWEGA v HILLTOP TAXIS LTD & BARNABAS KIPROP LETING [2011] KEHC 494 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 537 OF 2004

FREDRICK OENGA NYAMWEGA...........................................APPELLANT/ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

HILLTOP TAXIS LTD.........................................................................................1ST RESPONDENT

BARNABAS KIPROP LETING..........................2ND   RESPONDENT/ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS

(Being an appeal from the Judgment of C. Meoli Esq Senior Principal Magistrate dated

9th July 2004 in CMCC 6847 of 2000 at Milimani Commercial Courts, Nairobi)

R U L I N G

Application to Serve through Substituted ServiceDated 7th July 2011

I.INTRODUCTION

1. The Subordinate Court case involves a running down case. The appellant original plaintiff had sued the first and second respondent in TORT seeking damages due to their negligence whereby he was run down by their motor vehicle that caused him injury.

2. The trial magistrate ruled that no negligence had been proved. The suit was dismissed.

IIAPPLICATION 7TH JULY 2011

3. The appellant filed appeal on 22nd July 2004. The respondents were not served with any documents except the record of appeal filed on 22nd November 2007. The reasons being that their advocate ceased to act for them being M/s Kipkorir Titoo Kiara & Co Advocates. Their last known address is the only contact the advocate had.

4. Efforts to serve them personally was not fruitful. They asked for substituted service to be effected.

IIIFINDINGS

5. The applicant has demonstrated efforts made to trace the respondents (Muga SPDR) (5th May 2009). Their advocate is no longer on record.

6. I would agree and grant the application for service to be effected by substitutive service. The advocate has requested this be done by registered post to their last known address.

7. This is granted. Order that the substituted service be by registered post. There must be an envelope containing the equivalent number of stamps, retained by the applicant, as the one sent. There is required to be a certificate of posting. An affidavit of service to this effect be made.

8. All documents required be served through the registered post being the record of appeal, the memorandum of appeal and hearing notice for the next direction date.

9. Costs in the appeal.

DATED THIS 4th DAY OF OCTOBER 2011 AT NAIROBI

M.A. ANG’AWA

JUDGE

Advocates:

i)              J Nyakiangana instructed by Julius Nyakiangana & Co Advocatesfor the appellant

ii)             No appearance for the respondents