GABRIEL WANYONYI, CHARLES WAFULA BARASA & KENNEDY JUMA WANYONYI v HUDSON N. WALERA [2006] KEHC 1491 (KLR) | Dismissal For Want Of Prosecution | Esheria

GABRIEL WANYONYI, CHARLES WAFULA BARASA & KENNEDY JUMA WANYONYI v HUDSON N. WALERA [2006] KEHC 1491 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA

Civil Appeal 108 of 2000

(Arising from Original Webuye RM  CC. No.87 of 1995)

1GABRIEL WANYONYI

2CHARLES WAFULA BARASA

3      KENNEDY JUMA WANYONYI ..............................................................................APPELLANTS

VS

HUDSON N. WALERA...................................................................................................RESPONDENT

RULING

By a  letter dated 15th July 2005, M/S Bulimo & Co. Advocates applied that the appeal be placed before the Judge for dismissal under Order XLI Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules (Cap 21) Laws of Kenya.  The applicant cited two grounds:

i)   Since the appeal was admitted on 24th February 2003, the appellants have never prepared the record of appeal.

ii)  That the appellants have never made any application for directions.

Acting upon the said letter, the High court Registry, on 13th October 2006, listed the appeal for dismissal.

When the parties appeared before me, Mr. Wekesa for the respondent urged me that the appeal be dismissed on the grounds cited hereinabove.

Mr. Inganga, for the appellant, urged me to save the appeal since the memorandum of appeal has already been filed.

I have on my own, perused the court file and found as a fact that the memorandum of appeal was filed on 25th January, 2006.  In addition thereto, there is an application by way of chamber summons dated 9th November  2005, by the appellant, seeking that direction be taken which has not been heard.

In the light of the foregoing, I take the position that the appellant has at least woken up from the deep slumber.

In the circumstances, the only order that commends itself to me is to put the appellant on his toes.  Accordingly, I order that the appellant do process the appeal for hearing within 12 months, failing which this appeal be deemed as dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Dated at Bungoma this  21st  day of  February  2006.

N.R.O. OMBIJA

JUDGE

Wekesa for Respondent

N/A for Appellant.