Gikunju v Njeri t/a Munjethi Investments & 2 others [2023] KEELC 20812 (KLR) | Pretrial Objections | Esheria

Gikunju v Njeri t/a Munjethi Investments & 2 others [2023] KEELC 20812 (KLR)

Full Case Text

Gikunju v Njeri t/a Munjethi Investments & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 411 of 2018) [2023] KEELC 20812 (KLR) (18 October 2023) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 20812 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi

Environment & Land Case 411 of 2018

LN Mbugua, J

October 18, 2023

Between

Raphael Wanjohi Gikunju

Plaintiff

and

Jacinta Njeri t/a Munjethi Investments

1st Defendant

Gatundu Mang'u Farm Company Limited

2nd Defendant

Kenya Urban Roads Authority

3rd Defendant

Ruling

2ND Ruling 1. I have considered the objection raised by counsel for the 3rd defendant who prays that the maker of the valuation report should be the one to produce that document.

2. This court makes reference to the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code which gives guidance on conduct of pretrial. The court also makes reference to the case of Virginia Kathambi Maina V. Nicholas Mwatika & others [2021] eKLR where the court had this to say “practice directions acts as a reflux value to facilitate progress and avoid stagnation in resolution of disputes”.

3. The court went ahead to reject on objection raised regarding the production of documents, stating that such an objection ought to have been raised during the pretrial exercise.

4. As already stated in. In an earlier ruling, pretrial directions were conducted on 18. 11. 2020 and on 8. 6.2023. Even on the date of 2. 2.2023 when the matter was listed as a hearing, the court still conducted some form of pretrial exercise.

5. I further make reference to the Practice Directions gazette notice No. 5178 of 25. 7.2014 and the one of 11. 1.2022 gazette notice No. 189 which guides the court on conduct of pretrial. In particular Section 28 (g) of the practice directions of 25. 7.2014 clearly stipulates that the pretrial exercise is the platform upon which objections on production of documents should be conducted.

6. In that regard, the objection raised by counsel for 3rd defendant is dismissed.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS.LUCY N. MBUGUAJUDGE