The court found that the applicant/objector failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that she was married to the deceased under Kikuyu customary law or by presumption of marriage. The evidence presented did not establish the essential elements of a customary marriage, particularly the ngurario ceremony, nor did it demonstrate long cohabitation or acts of general repute sufficient to invoke the presumption of marriage. There was also no credible documentary or oral evidence linking the alleged children to the deceased as dependants. The applicant's evidence was inconsistent, and her credibility was undermined by discrepancies regarding her name and the timing of her alleged marriage. The court concluded that the applicant did not meet the threshold for revocation of the confirmed grant under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. Consequently, the application for revocation was dismissed, the restraining order vacated, and the administrator directed to confirm distribution of the estate.