The court found that while there was an inordinate and inexcusable delay of approximately 14 months after March 2018 in prosecuting the application for revocation of grant, the applicant failed to demonstrate specific prejudice suffered as a result of the delay. Given the nature of the matter, which concerns the distribution of family property, the court exercised its discretion against dismissal, holding that substantive justice required giving the respondent another opportunity to prosecute his application. The respondent was, however, found to be at fault for the delay and was ordered to pay the costs of the application to the applicant. The respondent was directed to fix the hearing date on a priority basis.