The court found that the applicant/objector, as a purchaser of part of the deceased's land, was not entitled to seek revocation of the grant of letters of administration under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. The applicant was neither a beneficiary nor a dependant of the deceased and thus lacked locus standi to apply for revocation. The court held that failure to include a purchaser's interest in succession proceedings does not render the grant defective or fraudulent. The proper remedy for a purchaser is to pursue a claim for specific performance against the administrator of the estate, not to seek revocation of the grant. The court emphasized that submissions are not evidence and that the applicant failed to prove any of the statutory grounds for revocation. Consequently, the summons for revocation of grant was dismissed.