In re Kipsigei Arap Chumo alias Kipsige Arap Chumo (Deceased) [2024] KEHC 15969 (KLR)

In re Kipsigei Arap Chumo alias Kipsige Arap Chumo (Deceased) (Succession Cause 157 of 2012) [2024] KEHC 15969 (KLR) (18 December 2024) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15969 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Kericho

Succession Cause 157 of 2012

JK Sergon, J

December 18, 2024

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KIPSIGEI ARAP CHUMO alias KIPSIGE ARAP CHUMO (DECEASED)

Between

Jonah Kipkurui Sigei

1st Petitioner

Erick Kipkorir Sigei

2nd Petitioner

Reuben Kiprotich Sigei

3rd Petitioner

and

Esther Chepkemoi Chumo

Objector

Ruling

1. The application combining up for hearing is a notice of motion dated 18th June, 2024 seeking the following orders;(i)That the Applicant be allowed to amend the order dated 11th December, 2020 issued by this Honourable Court.(ii)That order being directed to the Deputy Registrar Kericho Law Courts to transfer the land parcels Kericho/Kabartegan/331, Kericho/Kabartegan/56 and Kericho/Kabartegan/335 to the Respondents be changed and re-issue an order directing the Deputy Registrar Kericho High Court to transfer the land parcel Kericho/Kabartegan/335 to the Applicant herein upon payment of the requisite fees.(iii)That costs of the application be in the cause.

2. The application is based on the grounds stated on the face of it and the facts deponed in the supporting affidavit of Esther Chepkemoi Chumo the Objector/Applicant herein and one of the beneficiaries of the estate of the deceased.

3. She stated that the Respondents are her brothers who subdivided and shared the properties of their late father excluding her.

4. She avers that on 11th December, 2020, the Respondents filed an application under a certificate of urgency seeking to compel the Land Registrar-Kericho County to remove the caveat placed on the parcels of land known as Kericho/Kabartegan/331, Kericho/Kabartegan/56 and Kericho/Kabartegan/335 and execute transfer documents in favour of the Respondents on her behalf.

5. She avers that on 11th December, 2020 this Honourable Court issued an order directing the Deputy Registrar to transfer Kericho/Kabartegan/331, Kericho/Kabartegan/56 and Kericho/Kabartegan/335 to the Respondents.

6. She avers that the Respondents wanted to disinherit her without any reasonable cause.

7. She also stated that the Respondents have refused to give her a share in the estate of the deceased and unless an order is re-issued directing the Deputy Registrar to transfer land parcel known as Kericho/Kabartegan/335 to her name she will suffer irreparable loss and damage.

8. When the matter came up for inter partes hearing, Mr. Bii the Learned Counsel for the Objector/Applicant submitted that the application was served and there was no response. The Petitioners/Respondents were appeared in person. This court directed the parties to exchange and file their written submissions.

9. Despite having been served with the instant Application, the Petitioners/Respondents did not deem it fit to file a response to the same. None of the parties filed written submissions as directed by the Court.

10. I have already set out the arguments put forward by the applicant. She is basically beseeching this Court to amend the Order issued on 11th December, 2020 directing the Deputy Registrar of this Court to transfer the Parcels of land known as Kericho/Kabartegan/331, Kericho/Kabartegan/56 and Kericho/Kabartegan/335 to the Petitioners/Respondents be changed and substituted with an order directing the Deputy Registrar to instead transfer the Parcel of land known as Kericho/Kabartegan/335 to the Objector/Applicant.

11. I have examined the Court record and it is apparent that title to the Parcel of Land known as Kericho/Kabartegan/335 was closed upon subdivision on 6th March, 2015 as indicated in annexture marked ‘ECC1’. Therefore, the order sought cannot be issued since it seeks to transfer a non-existent title.

12. In the end, this court finds that the aforesaid motion lacks merit. The same is hereby ordered dismissed. Since this dispute involves members of the same family, therefore a fair order on costs is that each party should bear their own costs.

DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT KERICHO THIS 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024. ……………………………J.K. SERGONJUDGEIn the Presence of:-C/Assistant – RutohNo Appearance