Jacob Njeru Karuku v Jacob Njeru Karuku [2021] KEELC 2778 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT

AT CHUKA

CHUKA ELC APPEAL CASE NO. E003  OF 2021

JACOB NJERU KARUKU.............................................................................APPELLANT

VERSUS

NJAGI NJUGUNA.......................................................................................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. This application is dated 2nd June, 2021 and it has been brought to court under Article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21, Laws of Kenya, Order 42 Rule 6 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, the inherent powers of the court and all other enabling provisions of the law.

2. The application seeks the following orders:

1. THAT this Application be heard ex parte in the first instance in view of its urgent nature.

2. THAT pending the hearing and determination of the Application dated 12th April, 2021 this Honourable Court be pleased to Order stay of execution of the Ruling delivered by the Honourable N Kahara (SRM) on 8th April, 2021 in Chuka LDT 15 of 2009 and any Order arising therefrom.

3. THAT the costs of this Application be provided for.

3. The application is supported by the affidavit of Nimrod Matunda, the applicant’s advocate, and has the following grounds:

1. ON11th April, 2021 the Honourable Court considered the Notice of Motion dated 12th April, 2021 and fixed the same for directions on 14th June, 2021.

2. UNFORTUNATELY, the Respondent herein has made deliberate plans, obtained eviction orders from the lower court and has embarked on a mission to evict the Appellant on 8th June, 2021 in order to circumvent and defeat the hearing of the Application dated 12th April, 2021 and ultimately render the intended Appeal nugatory.

3. THE Appellant is therefore justifiably apprehensive that unless the Honourable Court intervenes now and grants an Order of Staying the planned eviction, the Respondent will proceed to execute against the Appellant on 8th June, 2021 and evict him thereby occasioning the Appellant substantial loss and rendering the Appeal an academic exercise.

4. THERE is real and imminent danger that unless prayer 3 on the Notice of Motion dated 12th April, 2021 as sought is granted in the first instance, the Respondent shall execute before the filed Appeal is heard and determined thereby exposing the Appellant to irreparable loss and damage and further render the appeal nugatory and merely academic.

5. THEAppellant therefore seeks the intervention of the Honourable Court, to stay in the interim the intended eviction in term of prayer 3 on the substantive application dated 12th April, 2021 until when parties appear before court on 14th June, 2021 for further directions.

6. IFthe Honourable court does not intervene as a matter of urgency and stay the implementation of the impugned ruling the law of the jungle will take precedent whereof the appellant will be evicted.

7. THIS Application is not frivolous; it is arguable and has been brought without unreasonable delay.

4.  When the matter came up for directions on 28. 6.2021, the applicant and his advocate were not in court. The respondent’s advocate, Mr. Muthomi Gitari, told the court that this court had on 7. 6.2021 granted the appellant a conditional stay of execution on condition that the appellant deposited with court, as security the sum of Kshs.500,000/= within 14 days. Mr. Gitari brought to the attention of the court this court’s Deputy Registrar’s letter dated 24th June, 2021 in which she confirmed that the appellant had not complied with the apposite court’s order. For this reason, he asked the court to dismiss the appellant’s application.

5.  I find as a fact that the appellant has not complied with the court order that a sum of Kshs.500,000/= being deposit for security be deposited with court within the stipulated time.

6. In the circumstances, I find the application by the respondent’s advocate that the application be dismissed is meritorious. The following orders are issued:

a) Application dated 2. 6.2021 is dismissed with the effect that the conditional stay of execution stands vacated and costs are awarded to the respondent.

b) The Appellant is directed to file and serve the record of Appeal within 14 days of today.

c) As he has undertaken, Mr. Muthomi, the respondent’s advocate to serve the orders issued today upon the appellant’s advocate within 7 days of today.

d)  Directions on 26. 7.2021.

DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT CHUKA THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021 IN THE PRESENCE OF:

CA: Ndegwa

Muthomi Gitari for the Respondent

P. M. NJOROGE,

JUDGE.