JANE WANGECHI WACHIRA & STEPHEN MWANIKI WACHIRA v CHARLES GICHUKI WACHIRA [2007] KEHC 1820 (KLR) | Probate And Administration | Esheria

JANE WANGECHI WACHIRA & STEPHEN MWANIKI WACHIRA v CHARLES GICHUKI WACHIRA [2007] KEHC 1820 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT NYERI

Succession Cause 17 of 2007

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF SIMON WACHIRA WANGORE- DECEASED

JANE WANGECHI WACHIRA

STEPHEN MWANIKI WACHIRA……………....APPLICANTS/PETITIONERS

Versus

CHARLES GICHUKI WACHIRA………….…….RESPONDENT/ OBJECTOR

RULING

The summons dated 31st August, 2007 is brought by the petitioners herein.  They seek the striking out of the objection filed by the objector herein.  The application is brought under rules 49, 59, and 73 of Probate and Administration Rules.  In support of that application the petitioners in their affidavit state that the basis of the objection was that it is alleged by the objector that the deceased before his death had made an oral will.  The objector stated in his objection that the oral will was witnessed by two persons.  The petitioners deponed that it is not true that an oral will had been made by the deceased.  They had made effort to contact the alleged witnesses of that oral will who had denied being witnesses to such a will.  They deponed that the children of the deceased are in harmony in the manner of the administration of the deceased estate apart from the objector who was being adamant for his own reasons.

The objector opposed the application by a replying affidavit.  In that replying affidavit he reiterated the information in his objection that the deceased had made an oral will.  That if the succession was to proceed in the manner suggested by the petitioners the same would be against the wishes of the deceased.

I have considered the application before court and the opposition.  Apart from alleging that the deceased had made an oral will the objector also claimed that there were names of beneficiaries who had not been included in the petition.  Bearing in mind those objections, I am of the view that the just decision is that a grant should issue jointly to the petitioners and the objector.  The order of the court therefore is that a grant do issue in the names of JANE WANGECHI WACHIRA, STEPHEN MWANIKI WACHIRA AND CHARLES GICHUKI WACHIRA.  Each of those persons shall be at liberty to apply for confirmation of grant and on such an application being made any party may raise a protest in respect of the mode of distribution.

There shall be no orders as to costs in respect of the summons dated 31st August 2007.

MARY KASANGO

JUDGE

Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 15th day of November 2007

BY:  M. S. A MAKHANDIA

JUDGE