JERIA M. NYACHAMA MOCHENGO vs MATHEW MUCHIRI GITUTO & MBUNI TRANSPORT LTD [2000] KEHC 287 (KLR) | Fatal Accidents | Esheria

JERIA M. NYACHAMA MOCHENGO vs MATHEW MUCHIRI GITUTO & MBUNI TRANSPORT LTD [2000] KEHC 287 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

H.C.CIVIL CASE NO.4831OF 1991

JERIA M. NYACHAMA MOCHENGO …………….……… PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

MATHEW MUCHIRI GITUTO ……………………….. 1ST DEFENDANT

MBUNI TRANSPORT LTD …………………………… 2ND DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT

This claim arises out of a road accident, which occurred on 20th October 1987 along Mombasa Road involving a motor vehicle registration number KWN585 in which the deceased ELIKANA MOCHENGO was travelling as a fare-paying passenger.

The Plaintiff brought this suit in her capacity as the personal representative of the estate of the deceased.

The Plaintiff in her evidence told the court that when the deceased died his body was taken to Machakos general Hospital Mortuary. The body was later released to her for burial. She incurred Shs.50,000/=. Funeral expenses. She had to transport the body from Machakos to Kisii.

She also incurred Shs.100/= for police abstract and 50/= for death certificate. She further told the court that the deceased was a businessman in Mombasa and he used to get between 10,000/= to 15,000/= profit every month. He sent her Shs.2000/=every month for her use and the rest he spent in her children who stayed with him. She called one witness ELIJA OMANGA (P.W.2) who was with the deceased in the same bus when the accident took place. He blamed the accident on the driver of the said bus whom he said lost control due to high speed.

The defence had no evidence to offer. The Plaintiff’s remains unchallenged and I am satisfied that the same is proved in respect of liability. I now move to assess the damages. Counsel for the Plaintiff suggested the following figure. For loss of dependency he suggested a multiplier of 20 at a monthly income of Shs.10,000/- Loss of expectation of life Shs.100,000/= Pain and suffering Shs.10,000/= Funeral expenses Shs.50,000/= and death certificate Shs.150/= while counsel for the defendant suggested a multiplier of 8 at a monthly income of Shs.2000/= and submitted that the rest of claim must fail.

Both Counsels cited various authorities to support the suggested figure. I having considered the evidence and the submissions by both counsels I make the following awards. Loss of dependency I suggest a multiplier of 10 at a monthly income of Shs.5000/= This would work out as follows: 5000 x 10 x 12 = 60,000/=

Pain and suffering I award Shs.6,000/=. For funeral expenses the Plaintiff had told the court that she incurred Shs.50,000/=

Although she did not produce receipts, taking into account that when a person dies, funeral expenses must be incurred at his burial and that the body had to be transported all the way from Machakos to Kisii. I award Shs.40,000/= funeral expenses. The figure of Shs.150/= for the police abstract and death certificate is not disputed. The figure can be “brought” forward as follows

Loss of dependency. ……………….. Sh.600,000/=

Loss of expectation of life                 Sh.100,000/=

Funeral Expenses                               Sh 40,000/=

Other Specials                                      150/=

TOTAL                                                     SH.740,150/=

Accordingly there shall be Judgment for the Plaintiff and against the

Defendant for Sh.740,150/= with costs and interest

Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of March, 2000

J.L.A OSIEMO

JUDGE