Tembo and Ors v Bank of Zambia (SCZ Appeal 32 of 1997) [1997] ZMSC 50 (30 September 1997) | Redundancy | Esheria

Tembo and Ors v Bank of Zambia (SCZ Appeal 32 of 1997) [1997] ZMSC 50 (30 September 1997)

Full Case Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ZAMBIA SCZ Appeal No. 32 of 1997 HOLDEN AT LUSAKA (Civil Jurisdiction) JONAS TEMBO AND OTHERS Appellants and BANK OF ZAMBIA Respondent CORAM: Chaila, Chirwa and Muzyamba JJ. S. 30th September, 1997 For the Appellants : Mr. C. K. Banda of Chifumu Banda and Associates, Lusaka For the Respondent : Mr. J. Mensah of A. Chimota Chambers, Lusaka JUDGMENT Chaila J. S. delivered the judgment of the court. The appellants were employees of the Bank of Zambia and were declared redundant after an agreement between their Union and the Bank. The employees took the Bank to the Industrial Relations Court on the interpretation of the Collective Agreement and payments made to them. The lower court made a decision in their favour and ordered that the effective date of redundancy should be 10th August, 1994 and that they should be paid salaries and allowances applicable at that time. The Bank did not appeal against that judgment. They went and made payments which did not satisfy the judgment of the lower court. The employees went back to the Industrial Relations Court to complain that the Bank had not complied with the judgment. The lower court gave a different interpretation .and declared that the Bank was right in making payments which it had done. The employees being unhappy with that interpretation appealed to this court. Mr. Mensah, -the Advocate for the Bank has conceded to the fact that the Bank never appealed against the first judgment of the lower court and that the judgment was still enforceable. He has taken a very wise course. The first / 2 . . :; J2 - judgment was never appealed against and is still enforceable. The Bank was therefore in error in calculating the redundancy package out side the judgment. By consent this appeal is allowed. The finding of the lower court is set aside and we order that the first judgment be satisfied and be complied with. As the Bank did concede to this appeal we make no order as to costs. M. S. Chai 1 a SUPREME COURT JUDGE D. K. Chi rwa SUPREME COURT JUDGE W. M. Muzyamba SUPREME COURT JUDGE