Joseph Mbogo Ishumael v Henry Namu & Wakere Mugo Munyambu [2014] KEHC 3622 (KLR) | Substitution Of Parties | Esheria

Joseph Mbogo Ishumael v Henry Namu & Wakere Mugo Munyambu [2014] KEHC 3622 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLICOF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA

ELC  CASE NO. 85  OF  2012

IN THE MATTER OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND ACT

AND

IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCEL NO. NTHAWA/GITIBURI/3065 NTHAWA/GITIBURI/3073

JOSEPH MBOGO ISHUMAEL .........................APPLICANT/PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

HENRY NAMU .................................1ST RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT

WAKERE MUGO MUNYAMBU .........2ND RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT

RULING

This is in respect to the plaintiff/applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 23rd December 2013 and filed on 14th January 2014 seeking to have HENRY NAMU and WAKERE MUGO MUNYAMBU (named as respondents) made parties to this suit.   The application is based on the ground that although the original defendant one MUGO  MUNYAMBU  died on 28th March 2013, the said  HENRY NAMU and WAKERE MUGO MUNYAMBU who are son and wife respectively of the deceased MUGO MUNYAMBU  have not taken any action to be legal representatives of the deceased hence this application.

The application is brought under Order 24 Rule 4 (1) (2) and (5) of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Order 24 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure  Rules  empowers the Court, upon the death of a sole defendant and on application, to

“ ---- cause the legal representative of the deceased defendant to be made a party -----”

Before an order can be made under the above rule, the person sought to be made a party has to be  “the legal representative  of the deceased defendant”.

A legal representative is defined in Section 2  of the Civil Procedure Act  to mean:-

“ a person who in law represents the Estate of a deceased person, and where a party sues or is sued in a representative character the person on whom the Estate devolves on the death of the party so suing  or sued”.

It is clear from the plaintiff/applicant’s affidavit in support of this Notice of Motion that neither HENRY NAMU nor WAKERE MUGO MUNYAMBU have taken out any grant of letters of administration in respect of the Estate of the deceased herein.  All they have done is obtained the burial permit.   They are not administrators of the Estate of their deceased father and husband respectively because an administrator is one to whom a grant of letters of administration has been issued.   They are therefore not the legal representatives of the Estate of the late MUGO  MUNYAMBU.   In the circumstances, it is difficult for this Court to make them parties in this case as prayed.  The only option left to the plaintiff/applicant in my view, is to move the High Court under Schedule 5 Rule 14  of the Law of Succession Act to appoint either of the two as administrators of the Estate of the late MUGO MUNYAMBU for purposes of this suit.

That being my view of the matter, the Notice of Motion dated 23rd December 2013 and filed herein on 14th January 2014 is dismissed with no order as to costs.

B.N. OLAO

JUDGE

10TH JULY, 2014

10/7/2014

Before

B.N. Olao – Judge

Mwangi – CC

Plaintiff - present

Defendants - absent

COURT:     Ruling delivered this 10th day of July 2014 in open Court.

Plaintiff present

Defendants – absent

B.N. OLAO

JUDGE

10TH JULY, 2014