JOSEPH NG’ANG’A MWAURA v JELEMANO MWANGI GICHUHI [2011] KEHC 1467 (KLR) | Limitation Of Actions | Esheria

JOSEPH NG’ANG’A MWAURA v JELEMANO MWANGI GICHUHI [2011] KEHC 1467 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT NAIROBI

CIVIL DIVISION

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 179 OF 2011

JOSEPH NG’ANG’A MWAURA............................................................................APPLICANT

V E R S U S

JELEMANO MWANGI GICHUHI.....................................................................RESPONDENT

R U L I N G

This is an application under section 27 of the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 21 for leave of the court to file suit out of time.   The intended suit is for damages on account of the death of one Reuben Gichimo Ng’anga, Deceased. The Deceased died from injuries sustained in a road accident that occurred on 11th February, 2008 along Nairobi–Naivasha Road at a place called Rironi. The present application was filed on 13th April, 2011.

Suits founded on tort must be brought within three years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.  The cause of action having accrued to the Applicant on 11th February, 2008 his suit should have been brought on or before 10th of February, 2011. As already seen the present application was filed on 13th April, 2011. The delay here is thus about two months.

Section 27 (1) of Cap 22 provides as follows:-

“27. (1) Section 4(2) does not afford a defence to an action founded on tort where-

(a)the action is for damages for negligence, nuisance or breach of duty (whether the duty exists by virtue of a contract or of a written law or independently of a contract or written law; and

(b)the damages claimed by the plaintiff for the negligence, nuisance or breach of duty consist of or include damages in respect of personal injuries of any person; and

(c)the court has, whether before or after the commencement of the action, granted leave for the purposes of this section; and

(d) the requirements of subsection (2) are fulfilled in relation to the cause of action.”

The intended action here is for damages for negligence. Such damages included damages in respect of personal injuries of the Deceased.

Regarding the requirements of sub-section (2) of section 27 aforesaid, I am satisfied that the same have been fulfilled in relation to the cause of action by the explanation for delay given in paragraph 7 of the supporting affidavit.  That explanation is that the Applicant was first unable to trace any witnesses to the accident whose statements were necessary to be filed together with the plaint as required by the new Civil Procedure Rules.

I will in the event allow the originating summons dated 12th April, 2011. The leave sought is granted. The Applicant shall file the intended suit within 21 daysof delivery of this ruling. In default the leave now granted shall lapse.

Costs of the application shall be in the suit to be filed. If no suit is ultimately filed, there will be no order as to costs of the application.

It is so ordered.

DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2011.

H.P.G. WAWERU

JUDGE

DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2011.