The court found that the Respondent's Agreement was the only admissible and enforceable contract, as it was produced in accordance with the law, supported by witness testimony, and not impugned by admissible evidence. The Appellant's Agreement was inadmissible because it was not pleaded in the Statement of Defence and was introduced late, denying the Respondent an opportunity to respond. The court emphasized that parties are bound by their pleadings and that only evidence supporting those pleadings is admissible. The Respondent proved her claim on a balance of probabilities, and the trial court's judgment was upheld. The appeal was dismissed as unmeritorious, and the Respondent was entitled to costs.