Kangai Agapius Muthuri, Pielina Mukiri Kinyua, Evangeline Kagwiria Muthuri, Zipporah Karea Mwebia, Benedict Mwenda Muthuri, Stanley Mutiga Muthuri & Harriet Kiende Muthuri v Ereneus Nyamu Muthuri [2016] KEELC 84 (KLR) | Inhibition Orders | Esheria

Kangai Agapius Muthuri, Pielina Mukiri Kinyua, Evangeline Kagwiria Muthuri, Zipporah Karea Mwebia, Benedict Mwenda Muthuri, Stanley Mutiga Muthuri & Harriet Kiende Muthuri v Ereneus Nyamu Muthuri [2016] KEELC 84 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU

CIVIL SUIT NO. 183 OF 2016

KANGAI  AGAPIUS MUTHURI................................1ST PLAINTIFF

PIELINA MUKIRI KINYUA........................................2ND PLAINTIFF

EVANGELINE KAGWIRIA MUTHURI.......................3RD PLAINTIFF

ZIPPORAH KAREA MWEBIA..................................4TH PLAINTIFF

BENEDICT MWENDA MUTHURI...............................5TH PLAINTIFF

STANLEY MUTIGA MUTHURI..................................6TH PLAINTIFF

HARRIET KIENDE MUTHURI.....................................7TH PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

ERENEUS NYAMU MUTHURI..................................... DEFENDANT

R U L I N G

1. This application is dated 29th September, 2016 and seeks orders:-

(1) THAT this application be certified urgent.

(2) THAT an order of inhibition do issue restraining the registration of dealings relating to L.R NOS ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/586, 590 and 591 pending the hearing and determination of this application.

(3) THAT an order of inhibition do issue restraining the registration of dealings relating to L.R.NOS. ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/589, 590 and 591 pending the hearing and determination of this suit.

(4) THAT costs of this application be in the main suit.

2. The application was fixed to be heard on 05/12/2016.

3. When the application was called out for hearing the Plaintiff's Advocate was not in Court. Mr. Muriuki told the Court that the application had been given a hearing date in the presence of the Advocates representing the parties.  He urged the Court to dismiss the application.

4. I deem the application heard interpartes but in the interest of Justice order that an order of Inhibition be registered against L.R NOS. ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/ 589, 590 and 591 pending hearing and determination of this suit.

5. When Miss Nyaga , the Advocate for the Plaintiffs, came to Court very late, she wanted  the Court to review its decision . She did not give  any reason as to why she came to Court late. In the circumstances, I decline her request.

6. As I have already said, in the Interest of  Justice:-

It is ordered that an Order of Inhibition be registered against L.R. NOS. ABOTHUGUCHI/GITIE/589, 590 and 591 pending hearing  and determination of this suit .

7. Costs apposite to this application are awarded to the Defendant and to be in the cause.

8. The Plaintiff is ordered to fully comply with Order 11, CPR, within 30 days of today and the Defendant to do so  within 30 days upon service of the Plaintiff's compliance documents.

9. The Plaintiff, and in default the Defendant, to set this suit down for hearing within 90 days of today.

10. It is so ordered.

DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER ,2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:

C.A Daniel/ James

Miss Nyaga for the Plaintiffs

Ken Muriuki for the Defendant

P.M. NJOROGE

JUDGE