Kawongolo Kataswa v Claudine Uwineza (Divorce Cause 3 of 2022) [2025] UGHC 513 (14 July 2025)

## THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA

### HOLDEN AT JINJA

## **DIVORCE CAUSE 3 OF 2022**

# KAWONGOLO KATASWA """"""""" PETITIONER

#### **VRS**

# CLAUDINE UWINEZA ………………………………………………………………………………………………

### BEFORE: GIDUDU, J

#### **JUDGMENT.**

The petitioner and respondent got married on 14<sup>th</sup> May 2011 at kingdom Hall of Jehovah's witnesses in Jinja. A marriage certificate and photographs of the ceremony were attached and admitted as

During the marriage, they had three issues namely, Kataswa Jeremiah, Kataswa Nehemiah and Kataswa Shelemiah now aged 13, 11 and 9 respectively.

On 3/12/2018 the respondent deserted the petitioner's home and lived independently. She also committed acts of adultery and as a result has a child aged one and half years from another man.

In 2022, the petitioner filed for divorce for the dissolution of the marriage on grounds of desertion and adultery.

The petitioner contends that there is no connivance and did not condone the acts of the respondent.

The respondent was served with the petition on $14/7/2022$ . She did not file a reply. Later on $6/6/2025$ she was served with a hearing notice. She appeared at the hearing. She admitted to acts of desertion and adultery contending that she never loved the

> All Certify that this is a true Copy of the Original

> > 1 i jul 2025

Assistant Registrar **JINJA**

petitioner but was in that union for lack of accommodation and

The petition is proved by the admission of the allegations by the respondent. She has a child out of her adulterous acts. There is no evidence of connivance between the two. There is no evidence that the petitioner condoned in the adultery.

The petitioner prayed for a decree nisi, custody of the children and maintenance of the children by the respondent plus costs. The respondent did not contest custody of the children by the petitioner but asked for visitation rights especially taking them in during holidays. She stated she was in her home and is not staying with any man. She sells vegetables and charcoal to survive.

$\boldsymbol{I}$ have reviewed the statements in the petition and having listened to the respondent. the court is satisfied that the petitioner has proved his case and I make the following orders: -

- (a) A *decree nisi* is granted for *dissolution* of the marriage. - (b) The petitioner shall have custody of the three children. - $\overline{c}$ (c) The respondent shall have visiting rights to see the children and during holidays may take them to her place of abode for at least two weeks provided she is not staying with another man - (d)No order as to costs since this is a family matter. - (e) Orders of maintenance have no relevance and are declined. - (f) The petitioner shall look after and maintain his children.

Ġidudu Lawrence 14<sup>th</sup> July 2025. **JUDGE**


$\mathsf{2}$