The court found that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case as there was no executed contract or sufficient documentary evidence to prove that the defendant engaged the applicant for consultancy services. The documents relied upon by the applicant were not executed by the defendant, and any engagement appeared to be between the applicant and the contractor, not the defendant. The court further held that even if the applicant's intellectual property was used, any resulting loss could be adequately compensated by damages. The sum claimed was not substantiated by supporting documentation, and the defendant would be able to pay any damages if the applicant succeeded at trial. Consequently, the threshold for granting a temporary injunction was not met.