Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Nairobi Gymkhana Sports [2016] KEELRC 1475 (KLR) | Collective Bargaining Agreements | Esheria

Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Nairobi Gymkhana Sports [2016] KEELRC 1475 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI

CAUSE NO 1985 OF 2015

KENYA HOTELS AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION...........................CLAIMANT

VS

NAIROBI GYMKHANA SPORTS CLUB..........................................RESPONDENT

AWARD

1. This is an economic dispute between Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union, the Claimant and Nairobi Gymkhana Sports Club, the Respondent. The Claimant is a registered trade union operating in the hospitality sector and the Respondent is a private club which offers hospitality services to its members.

2.   The dispute arises from a disagreement on the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement, specifically on the following items:

Leave traveling allowance

Bonus

Staff food

Funeral assistance upon the death of an employee

General wage increment

House allowance

Service charge

3. Proceedings at the conciliation stage did not resolve these issues which have therefore been escalated to this Court for determination.

4.  The deadlock plays out as follows:

Item                                Union Demand                         Employer's Offer

Leave traveling allowance    Kshs.6,500                                Kshs.6,000

Bonus                                       Kshs.6,000                                 Discretionary

Staff food                                At employer's cost                       Cost sharing

Funeral assistance               Kshs.100,000                               Kshs.80,000

General wage increment

1st year-15%

2nd year- 15%

1st year-9%

2nd year- 10%

House allowance

1st year-Kshs.8,000

2nd year-Kshs.8,500

1st year-Kshs.6,300

2nd year-Kshs.6,600

Service charge                       To be activated                         No offer

5.    In determining economic disputes, the Court must consider the macro economic environment in which the parties operate as well as the specific employer's productivity and profitability levels.

6.  The Claimant referred the Court to the Consumer Price Indices (CPI) and inflation rates (2013-2015) published by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Looking at these statistics, both overall CPI and inflation rates have generally been on an upward trend.

7.    The Court was also referred to the Respondent's financial statements which reflect a fairly healthy position. In response, the Respondent states that the surpluses made are applied towards capital development and improvement.

8.   I have considered the submissions by the parties and balancing the needs of the employees against the employers' sustainability and growth projections I make the following award:

Leave traveling allowance – Kshs.6,000

The employer will provide wholesome food to employees working between 11. 00 am and 11. 00 pm

Funeral assistance – Kshs.100,000

General wage increment:

1st year-12. 5%

2nd year – 15%

House allowance:

1st year – 7,000

2nd year –7,500

Service charge – to be effected in accordance with industry practice

9.      No basis was laid for a general provision for bonus and I therefore make no award on this account.

10.    I direct the parties to conclude the pending collective bargaining agreement within the next 30 days from the date of this award.

11.    Each party will bear their own costs.

12.    Orders accordingly.

DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS

1ST DAY OF APRIL 2016

LINNET NDOLO

JUDGE

Appearance:

Mr. Simiyu (Union Representative) for the Claimant

Mr. Nyaencha for the Respondent