Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees v Sports Stadia Management Board [2017] KEELRC 1110 (KLR) | Union Recognition | Esheria

Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees v Sports Stadia Management Board [2017] KEELRC 1110 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA

AT NAIROBI

CAUSE NUMBER 1915 OF 2014

KENYA UNION OF ENTERTAINMENT AND

MUSIC INDUSTRY EMPLOYEES..................CLAIMANTS/APPLICANT

VERSUS

SPORTS STADIA MANAGEMENT BOARD.....................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. By a motion dated 17th November, 2016 the Claimant sought a review of the court’s judgment delivered on 27th May, 2016.  In that judgment, the court observed that the issue of recognition  was a preliminary factor which had to be resolved first before the court could consider the issues forming the substance of the dispute before it.  The court therefore directed that the issue of recognition be resolved first under Labour Relations Act.

2. I have reviewed the report filed by the conciliator in this matter and noted the respondent herein failed to co-operate in the conciliation process forcing the conciliator to rely on affidavits and supporting documents filed by the respondent in this cause for background information.

3. Further the court has considered submissions by both parties and agrees with the conciliator’s observation that the respondent did not validly revoke the recognition agreement between it and the Claimant as required by section 54(5) of the Labour Relations Act.  The respondent therefore lacked the capacity to enter into another recognition agreement with KUDHEIHA.

4. There is however a registered CBA between the respondent and KUDHEIHA.  The registration was done on 8th July, 2015.  The court will not disturb this status quo but will order that KUDHEIHA does not negotiate a new  CBA upon the expiry of the current one.  The Claimant unless validly and procedurally replaced shall continue to enjoy recognition for purposes of CBA negotiations with the respondent.

5. In conclusion the court orders as follows:

a. The judgment delivered on 27th May, 2016 is hereby reviewed to the extent that the dispute submitted to the court for resolution has been overtaken by events following the registration of a CBA between the respondent and KUDHEIHA.

b. The respondent shall continue to recognize the Claimant for purposes of future CBA negotiations until such time that Claimant shall be validly de-recognised in accordance with Labour Relations Act.

c. The respondent shall remit to the Claimant unpaid union dues and agency fee for the period of 2011 up to September 2015 when CBA with KUDHEIHA was registered.

It is so ordered.

Dated at Nairobi this 23rd  day of June 2017

Abuodha J. N.

Judge

Delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of June 2017

In the presence of:-

…….……………….. for the Claimant

……………………... for the Respondent

Abuodha J. N.

Judge