Khamisi Abdalla Ngonyo v Steelmakers Limited [2018] KEELRC 1599 (KLR) | Unfair Termination | Esheria

Khamisi Abdalla Ngonyo v Steelmakers Limited [2018] KEELRC 1599 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CAUSE NO. 1640 OF 2013

KHAMISI ABDALLA NGONYO...........................................CLAIMANT

VERSUS

STEELMAKERS LIMITED..............................................RESPONDENT

JUDGEMENT

1. The claimant averred that he was employed as a machine operator by the respondent in 2006 and was later promoted to a supervisor.  His monthly salary at the time of termination was Kshs 9,400/=.

2. On 26th August,2011he claimed he went over his duties as usual.

By about 7:40 am he had finished recruiting new employees when the manager Mr Namhau called him to his office and issued him with a suspension letter.  He was accused of soliciting bribes from the new recruits.  On 8th November, 2011 after the conclusion of investigations he was issued with a dismissal letter.  The claimant complained that before the dismissal he was never called to give his side of the story.  He further complained that upon dismissal the respondent never paid him his terminal dues.

3. The respondent on its part denied the claimant discharged his duties and accused him of several acts of corruption.  The respondent further averred that the claimant was summoned by the Human Resource Head where the allegations were explained to him and was given opportunity to be heard before dismissal.

4. At the trial both sides repeated the averments in their pleading hence need to reproduce there oral testimony. The claimant was suspended on 26th August, 2011 on allegations of bribery. The suspension was stated to be pending investigations.  On 8th November, 2011 he was issued with a letter of summary dismissal. The letter informed him that the allegations of bribery against him had been confirmed.

5. There was no material on record that once the allegations of bribery were confirmed the claimant was called to a disciplinary hearing where he was confronted with the evidence and his reactions sought.  This is an essential requirement under the Employment Act and failure to observe this leads to the termination or dismissal being deemed unfair.

6. The court therefore so finds and awards the claimant as follows

a.  One month’ salary in lieu of notice                19,400

b.  Salary for August, September and October   58,200

c.  Salary for 8 days in November                        5,173

d.  Accrued leave for one year                            19,400

e.  Six months salary as compensation for

Unfair dismissal                                                116,400

218,573

f. Items (a) to (e) shall be subject to taxes and statutory deductions.

g. Costs of the suit.

7. It is so ordered.

Dated at Nairobi this 6th day of July, 2018

ABUODHA J. N.

JUDGE

Delivered this 6th day of July, 2018

ABUODHA J. N.

JUDGE