Lesotho Stone Enterprises (Pty) Ltd v Construction, Mining, Quarrying And Allied Workers Union and Others (LC 38 of 12) [2012] LSLC 10 (10 October 2012) | Strike | Esheria

Lesotho Stone Enterprises (Pty) Ltd v Construction, Mining, Quarrying And Allied Workers Union and Others (LC 38 of 12) [2012] LSLC 10 (10 October 2012)

Full Case Text

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF LESOTHO LC/38/12 HELD AT MASERU In the matter between: LESOTHO STONE ENTERPRISES (PTY) LTD APPLICANT And CONSTRUCTION, MINING, QUARRYING AND ALLIED WORKERS THE DIRECTORATE OF DISPUTE PREVENTION AND RESOLUTION ARBITRATOR KETA 1st RESPONDENT 2nd RESPONDENT 3rd RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Date of hearing: 18th October 2012 Application for interdict – interim rule interdicting Respondent members from strike being issued. Respondent members continuing on a strike in spite of subsistence of rule – Applicant terminating their employment contracts. Applicant subsequent thereto withdrawing the application as object no longer exists. BACKGROUND OF THE ISSUE 1. This an application for an order of an interdict restraining Respondent members from engaging in allegedly unlawful strike. The application was moved on the 28th September 2012 and rule nisi was issued temporarily staying the strike action by Respondent members pending the finalisation of the matter. The rule was extended over a series of dates on request by both parties, until the 18th October 2012 when the matter was finally argued. It is against this background that this application was heard on this day. 1 | P a g e SUBMISSIONS 2. Mr. Motlere submitted that since the granting of the rule nisi interdicting Respondent members from continuing on their industrial action was granted, Respondent members have ignored the order and continued to strike. As a result, Applicant management has since terminated all their employment contracts. He these developments, the object of their application had ceased to exist and they wished to withdraw the matter. Mr. Mokhahlane for Respondent raised no objection to the withdrawal of the application but indicated that he was not aware about the developments. further submitted that due to 3. In of the submissions of the parties, I find no reason not to grant the withdrawal of this matter. Clearly the circumstances warrant the move taken by Applicant. Consequently, this application is dismissed in terms of rule 10 of the Labour Court Rules. THUS DONE AND DATED AT MASERU ON THIS 18th DAY OF OCTOBER 2012, .................................... T. C. RAMOSEME DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE LABOUR COURT OF LESOTHO (AI) .............................. R. MOTHEPU MEMBER ............................. P. LEBITSA MEMBER FOR APPLICANT: FOR RESPONDENT: MR. MOTLERE MR. MOKHAHLANE I CONCUR I CONCUR 2 | P a g e