Lilian Ngina Lele v Republic [2013] KEHC 699 (KLR) | Narcotic Possession | Esheria

Lilian Ngina Lele v Republic [2013] KEHC 699 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT MOMBASA

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 58 OF 2010

LILIAN NGINA LELE......…................................................….. APPELLANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC  ……….……....................................................…RESPONDENT

(From the Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal case No. 328 of 2010 Senior Resident Magistrate's Court Mombasa– Hon. Ondieki - SRM)

JUDGMENT

Lilian Ngina Lele hereinafter referred to as the Appellant was Convicted and Sentenced to a fine of Ksh. 300,000/= in default ten (10) years imprisonment for the offence of being in possession of narcotic drugs contrary to section 3(1) as read with section 2(b) of the narcotics and psychotropic substances control Act No. 4 of 1994.

The particulars being that on the 25th day of January, 2010 at about 11:20 am at Mwembe Tayari market in Mombasa County, jointly, with another not before the Court was found in possession of two sachets of heroin with a street value of Ksh. 400/= in contravention of the said Act.

The Accused pleaded guilty to the charge and was convicted and sentenced upon plea.

Her main ground of appeal is that the trial magistrate did not comply with the provisions of section 169 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Section 169 provides,

“Every Judgment shall except as otherwise expressly provided by this code, be written by or under thee direction of the presiding officer of  the Court in the language of the Court and shall contain the point or points   for determination, the decision    thereon, and the reasons for the  decision and shall be dated and signed by the presiding officer in  open Court at the time of    pronouncing it”.

In the  present case, there was no judgment written and delivered as the Appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and was convicted upon entering plea.  The appellant was sentenced to a fine of Ksh. 300,00/= in default ten years.  The sentence was not harsh or excessive.  I find no good reason to disturb the Conviction and Sentence.

The appeal  has no merit and it is rejected/dismissed.

Judgment delivered dated and signed this 11th day of December, 2013

…...................

M.  MUYA

JUDGE

11TH DECEMBER, 2013

In the presence of:-

Learned State Counsel Mr. Ayodo

The Appellant present

Court clerk Musundi