Lucy Wanjiru Njeru v Joseph Okwaro Olendo [2019] KEELC 345 (KLR) | Ownership Disputes | Esheria

Lucy Wanjiru Njeru v Joseph Okwaro Olendo [2019] KEELC 345 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT

MILIMANI LAW COURTS

ELC CASE NO.1154 OF 2015

LUCY WANJIRU NJERU............................................PLAINTIFF

=VERSUS=

JOSEPH OKWARO OLENDO.................................DEFENDANT

JUDGEMENT

1. The Plaintiff filed this suit against the Defendant in which she sought the following reliefs:-

a. A declaration that the Plaintiff is the lawful owner of plot number 0487 LR No.11531/14 Hurlingham Development Scheme.

b. A permanent injunction restraining the defendant whether by himself and or through agents, servants or employees from trespassing ,encroaching upon or from commencing and/or continuing with construction on plot no 0487 Hurlingham Development Scheme Chokaa.

c. Cost of this suit

d. Any other relief deemed apt and fitting.

2. The Defendant filed a defence but never attended court during the hearing despite his lawyers having been served. The hearing therefore proceeded ex-parte . The Plaintiff testified that in or around 9th August 2013, she purchased a plot identified as plot 0487 comprised in LR 11531/14which had been put up for sale by Hurlingham Squatters Development. The Plaintiff was taken to the site by a surveyor who had been engaged by Hurlingham Squatters Development.

3. The Plaintiff paid for the plot by instalments and upon completion of payments, she was issued with certificate of ownership No. 0345 and ballot number 782. She was then allowed to take possession and she started constructing a house. She constructed upto the lintel but she ran out of funds. She later re-commenced construction and was again stuck on the first floor. She was later called by a neighbour who informed her that there was someone who was continuing with construction. She went to the site where she found the defendant who alleged that he was constructing on plot No.0485 which he had allegedly purchased from one Lawrence Mutugi Kirimi. She reported the defendant to Kayole Police station. The defendant stopped constructing for a while before he again went on with construction and in 2019 February /March, the defendant moved into the unfinished buildings where he remains to-date.

4. The Plaintiff called PW1 Benson Ochoko the Chairman of Hurlingham  Squatters Development who testified how the Plaintiff went to their  offices where she stated that she wanted to purchase a plot. The  Plaintiff was given a surveyor who took her to the ground and showed  her plot 0487 after which she was given a beacon certificate and a  ballot which was duly signed by the surveyor. Upon payment of the  purchase price, the Plaintiff took possession and started construction.  Later the defendant invaded the Plaintiff’s plot claiming that the plot  had been sold to him by one Mr Kirimi. This witness stated that the  signature on the documents held by the defendant is not his and that  the one of their secretary is a forgery. He confirmed that plot 0487  belongs to the Plaintiff.

5. PW3 Nicholas Omondi Omedi is a surveyor by profession. This  witness testified that he was the one who was engaged by Hurlingham  Squatters Development to subdivide LR No 11531/14. After the  subdivision, he was retained as surveyor of Hurlingham Squatters  Development. When the Plaintiff went to purchase the suit property,  he is the one who accompanied her and showed her plot 0487 which  was vacant. After payment, he issued the Plaintiff with a beacon  certificate and ballot No.782 which he signed. This witness confirmed  that plot 0485 is both on the map and on the ground but that it is different from plot No.0487. He stated that whenever there is a sale  by Hurlingham Squatters Development, he has to be involved and that  he does not know Mutugi Kirimi who purported to sell plot 0485 to  the defendant.

6. I have considered the evidence adduced by the Plaintiff and the two  witnesses. This evidence is not controverted. The Plaintiff produced  certificate No.0345 in respect of plot No.0487 . The certificate was  issued on 9th August 2013. The Plaintiff also produced ballot No.782  duly signed by PW3 the surveyor who showed her the suit property.  She also produced a receipt for Kshs.20,000/= issued on account of  survey fee and ballot fee. The chairman of Hurlingham Squatters  Development had written a letter on 18th September 2015 confirming  that the plot in issue belonged to the Plaintiff. This letter was  produced and the chairman himself testified before the court.

7. The certificate held by the defendant was also produced. This  certificate is No. 857 and relates to plot No. 0485. This certificate was  issued on 5th November 2014. This is the certificate which PW1  denounced as a forgery. The certificate for Lawrence Mutugi Kirimi in  respect of Plot No. 0485 was denounced both by the chairman   (PW1) and the surveyor ( PW3).

8. As I said hereinabove, the defendant only filed a defence where he made a general denial. He never came to court to give  evidence. In the case of CMC Aviation Ltd – Vs- Cruisair Ltd(No 1) 1978 KLR 103;[1976-1980]I KLR  835,Madan J  (as he  then  was) stated as follows:-

“Pleadings contain the averments of the parties concerned.  Until they are proved, or there is an admission of them or  any of them, by the parties, they are not evidence and no  decision could be founded upon them. Proof is the foundation  of evidence. Evidence  denotes the means by which an alleged  matter of fact, the truth of which is submitted for investigation.  Until  their truth has been established or  otherwise, they remain  unproven. Averments in no way satisfy,  for example, the  definition of “evidence” as anything that makes clear or obvious;  ground for knowledge, indication or testimony; that which  makes truth evident, or renders evident  to the mind that is  truth.”

9. The Defendant having not adduced any evidence to controvert the  Plaintiff’s evidence, I find that the evidence of the Plaintiff remains uncontroverted. The evidence is credible. I therefore find that the Plaintiff has proved her case on a balance of probabilities. I enter Judgement for the Plaintiff against the defendant in terms of prayers  (a),(b) and (c)of the Plaint.

Dated, Signed and delivered at Nairobi on this 14th day of November 2019.

E.O.OBAGA

JUDGE

In the presence of:-

M/s Kirui for M/s Matata for Plaintiff

Court Assistant : Hilda

E.O.OBAGA

JUDGE