Manchester Outfitters Suiting Division Limited (Now Called) King Woollen Mills Limited & another v Standard Chartered Financial Services Limited & A.D. Gregory And C.D. Cahill [2021] KECA 538 (KLR) | Change Of Advocate | Esheria

Manchester Outfitters Suiting Division Limited (Now Called) King Woollen Mills Limited & another v Standard Chartered Financial Services Limited & A.D. Gregory And C.D. Cahill [2021] KECA 538 (KLR)

Full Case Text

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

AT NAIROBI

CORAM: SICHALE, JA (IN CHAMBERS)

CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 88 OF 2000

BETWEEN

MANCHESTER OUTFITTERS SUITING DIVISION LIMITED

(NOW CALLED) KING WOOLLEN MILLS LIMITED....1ST  APPELLANT

GALOT INDUSTRIES LIMITED.........................................2ND  APPELLANT

AND

STANDARD CHARTERED FINANCIAL

SERVICES LIMITED..........................................................1ST  RESPONDENT

A.D. GREGORY AND C.D. CAHILL................................2ND  RESPONDENT

(Being an appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (E.M. Githinji,J) dated 30th July, 1999

in  HCCC NO. 5002 OF 1990)

**************

RULING

The motion dated 8th February, 2021 came up for hearing before me on 22ndMarch, 2021. In the motion, the applicant, the firm ofAmolo & GacokaAdvocates applied for an order to cease acting for A.D Gregory, the 2nd respondent herein.

The motion is supported by the affidavit of James Gacoka Advocates sworn on 8th February, 2021 and on the grounds on the face of the motion. Briefly, the applicant’s position is that it was initially acting for the 1st and 2nd respondent; that in November, 2020, the 1st respondent appointed the firm of Oraro & Co. Advocatesto act on its behalf; that the 2nd respondent was the managing partner of KPMG, an audit firm and who was the joint receiver appointed by the 1st respondent; that since the retirement of the 2nd respondent from practice, the said firm (KPMG) has had no contact with the applicant.

There was no replying affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent who was served with a hearing notice by advertisement in the Standard Newspaper of12thMarch, 2021.

In view of the above, I think it is only fair that the firm of Amolo & Gacoka Advocatesshould be granted leave to cease acting for the 2nd respondent.

Accordingly, the motion dated 8th February, 2021 is hereby allowed. I make no order as to costs.

Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 21stDay of May, 2021.

F. SICHALE

......................................................

JUDGE OF APPEAL

I certify that this is a true copy of the original.

Signed

DEPUTY REGISTRAR