Martin v Republic (Bail Application Cause 167 of 2021) [2022] MWHC 224 (6 January 2022)

REPUBLIC OF MALAWI IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI ZOMBA DISTRICT REGISTRY BAYL APPLICATION CAUSE NUMBER 167 OF 2021 BETWEEN STANLY MARTIN —hecsecseneneenseentreeteneateenens APPLICANT AND THE REPUBLIC «—_cacsavensceseseveeusvereeautesenceecsewessneses RESPONDENT Coram: Honourable Justice Violet Palikena-Chipao Naeketa, of Counsel for the Applicant Niaveza, Senior State Advocate, of Counsel for the Respondent Kazambwe (Ms), Official Interpreter and Court Clerk RULING ON APPLICATION FOR BALL PENDING TRIAL 1. The Applicant, Stanly Martin, is on‘remand at Zomba Maximum Prison on allegations of murder. 2. The Applicant was arrested by Ntcheu police in January 2019, on the allegation of having caused the death of Edwin Kambale. 3 ‘The brief circumstances are that on the material day, the Applicant started quarrefling with the deceased when they were drinking local beer. Then the Applicant stabbed the deceased with a knife and he died. CA The Applicant has been in custody since he was arrested in January 2019. It is on the basis of the length of stay on remand without prospects of trial in the near future and the fact that the Applicant’s continued stay in custody is illegal as his pre-trial custody time limit expired long ago, that the Applicant prays to this court for bail. The State has indicated that has indicated that they cannot trace the docket and are not sue as to when trial can commence. On the application, the State has not laid any objection. The right to bail is guaranteed by section 42(2) (e) of the Constitution is subject to the interests of justice. Interest of justice has not been defined in the Constitution but the Bail Guidelines Act of 2000 offers guidance on what to consider when deciding whether or not it is in the interest of justice to grant bail. The Bail Guidelines Act in Section 3 under Part II on Bail by the Court Paragraph 4(a) to (d), lays down principles which the court should take into when deciding whether or not to grant bail. (a) the likelihood that the accused, if released on bail, will attempt to evade his or her trial {b} the likelihood that the accused, if he or she were released on bail, will attempt to influence or intimidate witnesses or to conceal or destroy evidence (c) the likelihood that the accused, if he or she were released on bail, will endanger the safety of the community or any particular person or will commit an offence {d) in exceptional circumstances, the likelihood that the release of the accused will disturb the public order or undermine the public peace or security The duty lies on the State to satisfy the court why bail should not be granted in the interest of justice. Whilst the burden to show that the interests of justice require further detention lies on the State, the Court may also on its own, notwithstanding any representations to the contrary by the Applicant or the State or both, make its independent finding upon weighing the personal circumstances of the accused Applicant and the 9 interests of Justice. According to Part I Section 9 of the Bail Guidelines Act, “Notwithstanding the fact that the prosecution does not oppose the granting of bail, the court has the duty to weigh up the personal interests of the accused against the interests of justice.” The State has not opposed the application for bail and has not laid any grounds why bail should not be granted in the interest of justice. The Court also has not found anything against the granting of bail more so considering that the Applicants have been on remand for 3 years now. The Applicants have overstayed on remand and it is only just that they be released on bail. Bail is therefore granted to the Applicant on the following conditions; a. Cash bond of K30, 000 Two sureties bonded in a non-cash sum of K100, 000 The Applicant and his sureties to produce their national identities Applicant is to report for bail at the nearest police station Fridays every fortnight Applicant is to surrender travel documents to the court if any. oR oO 9. The State is directed to take all preliminary steps for the trial of the Applicant including committal proceedings and filing of disclosures within 60 days from today. The matter is to come for plea and directions on 9h March, 2022 at 9am. It is so ordered. Pronounced in Chambers this 6" Day of January, 2022. pert Violet Palikena-Chipao JUDGE