Member of Parliament for Mbalambala Constituency v Abdi & 7 others [2022] KESC 73 (KLR) | Advocate Ceasing To Act | Esheria

Member of Parliament for Mbalambala Constituency v Abdi & 7 others [2022] KESC 73 (KLR)

Full Case Text

Member of Parliament for Mbalambala Constituency v Abdi & 7 others (Petition (Application) 21 (E023) of 2020) [2022] KESC 73 (KLR) (4 November 2022) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2022] KESC 73 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Supreme Court of Kenya

Petition (Application) 21 (E023) of 2020

I Lenaola, SCJ

November 4, 2022

Between

Member of Parliament for Mbalambala Constituency

Petitioner

and

Abdi Ahmed Abdi

1st Respondent

Cabinet Secretary for Interior and Co-ordination of National Government

2nd Respondent

County Commissioner, Garissa County

3rd Respondent

Attorney General

4th Respondent

Member of Parliament, Garissa Township Constituency

5th Respondent

Member of Parliament, Dadaab Constituency

6th Respondent

Governor, Garissa County

7th Respondent

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

8th Respondent

(Being an application by M/s Issa & C0 Advocates to cease acting for the 6th Respondent)

Ruling

1. UPON considering the Notice of Motion dated 31st January 2022 brought pursuant to Rules 18(6) and (7) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2020, in which counsel for the 6th respondent seeks leave of this court to cease acting for the respondent aforesaid; and

2. UPON reading the supporting affidavit in support of the Motion sworn by Mansour Muathe Issa, Advocate on 31st January 2022 and considering the grounds in support therein, mainly that his client has ceased contact and that despite several reminders the 6th respondent has failed to give him proper instructions and he is, therefore, unable to proceed with the hearing of the Petition on 10th November 2022; and

3. Noting that, although the Motion was served on the 6th respondent and all other parties none has responded to it;

4. I Opine that a party is expected to properly and fully instruct Counsel in order for it to receive the best legal advice. Failure to do so would mean that the matter stalls and the interests of justice would not be served. A court should also not force Counsel to appear for a party that has lost touch for whatever reason.

5. Accordingly, I now make the following Orders:i.The Notice of Motion dated 31st January 2022 be and is hereby allowed and M/S Issa & Co Advocates, are hereby granted leave to cease acting for the 6th Respondent.ii.The 6th Respondent shall pay the costs thereof.

6. Orders accordingly.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022. .....................................I. LENAOLAJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURTI certify that this is a true copy of the originalREGISTRAR,SUPREME COURT OF KENYA