The court found that the consent order of inhibition entered on 28th June 2007 was fraudulent and invalid, as it was made after the defendant had already sold the suit land to the interested party and after the court had dismissed an application seeking similar orders. The defendant was guilty of non-disclosure of material facts, and the consent was entered into without proper disclosure to the court and the interested party. The subsequent removal of the inhibition and transfer of the land to the interested party was based on an order from the Chief Magistrate's Court, but the District Land Registrar acted in contravention of the law by relying on that order while an inhibition from the High Court was still in force. The court set aside the fraudulent consent order but declined to revoke the transfer to the interested party at this stage, instead directing the District Land Registrar to explain the circumstances of the removal of the inhibition before making further orders.