The court found that the matter was not urgent and thus declined to certify it as such. The court directed that the relevant case file be availed, the application and order be served on the respondent within three days, and the respondent file a response by a specified date. The matter was set for mention before another judge for allocation or further directions. The court did not make a substantive determination on the merits of the application for release, instead focusing on procedural compliance and ensuring all parties are heard before any substantive orders are made.