Wakumelo v Belington (HP 2182 of 2015) [2016] ZMHC 55 (16 February 2016)
Full Case Text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR ZAMBIA ,cY- c AT THE PRINCIPAL REGISTRY AT LUSAKA ~ Q l\}'~~ pI'. ,~rt;o (CIVIL JURISDICTION) \s'fR'l REG 1\- /> . O. BOX 5006 • +'/' 0~~ ouR'f OF ZAMS,,,! ,~~'Pl\\.. 201 HP/2182 IN THE MATTER OF: AND IN THE MATTER OF: AND IN THE MATTER OF: BETWEEN: THE PREMISES KNOWN AS HOUSE NO. 728a and B. KAFUE AN APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER FOR THE RECOVERY POSSESSION OF PREMISES AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 4 (e)(i) OF THE RENT ACT CHAPTER 206 VOLUME 12 OF THE LAWS OF ZAMBIA TO ENTER UPON THE PREMISES TAKE POSSESSION AFORESAID AND MUTUMBA WAKUMELO (SUING AS BENEFICIARY OFTHE LATE JOSEPH WAKUMELO) APPLICANT AND SAMUEL BELINGTON RESPONDENT Before Hon. Mrs. Justice M. S. Mulenga on the 16'h day of February 2016 FOR THE PLAINTIFF FOR THE DEFENDANT' : IN PERSON : IN PERSON J U D MEN T This action was commenced by originating notice of motion filed on 16th November, 2015. The Applicant claims the following reliefs: J1 1. An order for eviction and possession plot 728 medium cost, Kafue town. of the property of 2. Costs of this action. 3. Any other relief as the Court shall deem fit. The Applicant in her affidavit in support states that she is the landlady for property known as house number 728 medium cost Kafue town as per copy of the distribution list of the estate by the administrator dated 11th March 2012. On 9th September, 2011 the Respondent entered into a tenancy agreement with Mildred Nkolola Wakumelo (then administrator of the estate) for the subject house for a period of one year. The tenancy agreement, exhibited as "MW2", was continued for another period of one year followingthe distribution of the estate in March 2012. The condition was that rentals were to be paid three (3) months in advance as provided in the tenancy agreement. On 1st December, 2013 the Respondent started becoming elusive in the payment of rentals and has accumulated rental arrears amounting to KI9,600.00 for a period of fourteen (14) months and has not shown interest or commitment in settling the said arrears. That this is an abrogation of the tenancy agreement particularly clause (a) thereby depriving the Applicant of income intended to meet other pressing obligations. That there is no existing lease agreement between the parties and the Respondent's continued J2 occupation has hindered her from letting the house to other tenants and hence the claim for the sought reliefs. The Respondent did not file an affidavit in opposition. At the hearing, the Respondent stated that he had been paying rentals but acknowledged that he was owing the Applicant KI6,800.00 in rental arrears as at the date of hearing. That he has assured the Applicant that he would pay once he gets what he was owed by his former employers. The facts are therefore not in dispute that the Respondent has been renting the Applicant's property in issue from 9th September, 2011 when it was being administered by the administrator of the estate of the late Joseph Wakumelo. The Applicant has been the owner of the said property from March 2012 and the parties verbally agreed for the Respondent to continue renting the property on the same terms but did not execute a tenancy agreement. It is also not in dispute that the Respondent is owing the Applicant rental arrears amounting to KI6,800.00. The fact that the Respondent is owing KI6,800.00 shows that he had not been paying rentals for a considerable time and is therefore in breach of the term that rentals were to be paid three (3) months in advance. This application has J3 been brought under section 4 (e) of the Rent Act Cap 206 (the Act) which provides as follows: "4. The court shall have power to do all things which it is required or empowered to do by or under the provisions of this Act, and in particular shall have power- (e) subject to the provisions of section thirteen, to make either or both of the following orders, that is to say: (i) an order for the recovery of possession of premises, whether in the occupation of a tenant or any other person; and (ii) an order for the recovery of arrears of standard rent, mesne profits and a charge for services. Section provides for circumstances upon which possession may be grounded as a matter of right. Section 13 (1) (a) is the one relevant in this case and it provides as follows: "13.(1) No order for the recovery of possession of any premises or for the ejectment of a tenant therefrom shall be made unless- (a) Some rent lawfully due from the tenant has not been paid, or some other obligation of the tenancy (whether under a contract of tenancy or under this Act) so far as the same is consistent with the provisions of this Act, has been broken or not performed; Subsection 2 provides that the court will only order recovery of possession if it considers the same reasonable in the circumstances of the case. I have considered the particular facts of this case that the Respondent is owing rentals amounting to K16,800.00 which are lawfully due from him to the Applicant. The Applicant has thus satisfied the requirements of the Act J4 and is entitled to the orders specified in section 4 (e) of the Act. I hereby grant the Applicant the orders as follows: (1) An order of eviction and recovery of possession of house no. 728(a) and (b) Kafue or plot No. 728 Kafue from the Respondent. I also grant an order for recovery of the rental arrears of to levy distress K16,800.00 for the same pursuant and leave for the Applicant to section 14 of the Act. (2) (3) The rental arrears will attract the average Bank of Zambia lending rate from the date of judgment interest at to payment. simple Costs are for the Applicant to be taxed III default of agreement. Leave to appeal is granted. Dated this 16'h day of February, 2016 ~ ........................................................ M. S. MULENGA HIGH COURT JUDGE J5