Mwenga Mutii v Joshua Karunge t/a Mwambao Café [2018] KEELRC 717 (KLR)
Full Case Text
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT MOMBASA
CAUSE NUMBER 166 OF 2015
BETWEEN
MWENGA MUTII.............................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
JOSHUA KARUNGE T/A MWAMBAO CAFE........RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Judgment was delivered in favour of the Claimant, for the sum of Kshs. 148,144. 35 comprising terminal dues and compensation for unfair termination, on 5th May 2017. The Claimant was also granted costs and interest.
2. Judgment was given in default of Response to the Claim.
3. The Respondent filed an Application on 4th October 2017, seeking to have Judgment set aside, and the Respondent allowed to respond to the Claim.
4. The Application is based on the Affidavit of the Respondent, sworn on 4th October 2017. He states he was never served with the Notice of Summons, Statement of Claim, and Mention Notices.
The Court Finds:-
5. The Claimant issued a letter of demand before instigation of the Claim, through Kituo Cha Sheria, dated 2nd February 2015.
6. Reply was made through B.W. Kenzi & Company Advocates, on 10th February 2015.
7. The Statement of Claim filed on 27th March 2015 indicated it was to be served upon B.W. Kenzi & Company Advocates.
8. There is no evidence that the Statement of Claim and other Court processes, reached B.W. Kenzi & Company Advocates.
9. Service appears to have been directed at an undisclosed Manager of the Respondent at a place called Mwembe Tayari. There is no acknowledgment of receipt by the undisclosed Manager.
10. Service was not proper. It did not meet the requirements of Rule 11 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) rules 2016.
11. Judgment obtained by the Claimant is founded on defective service, and cannot be sustained.
IT IS ORDERED:-
a) The Application by the Respondent filed on 4th October 2017 is allowed.
b) No order on the costs.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 30th day of October 2018.
James Rika
Judge